From: The Central Scrutinizer on
"David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:op.u7wmceo1a3w0dxdave(a)hodgins.homeip.net...
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:48:55 -0500, The Central Scrutinizer
> <gcisko(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am saying you appear to be a whacky nut-job that thinks MS is incapable
>> of
>> having an AV product because of who they are.
>
> Your a new poster here. Every once in a while, some m$ paid patsy
> shows up to claim their software is good, and I suspect you are
> another silly m$ employee.

Are you serious?

>> Hey pal I am the central scrutinizer not you OK. I'll tell you what
>> to trim and what not to trim. You dig?
>
> You're also obviously new to usenet

Sure I have been posting to usenet since the late 1980's early 1990's.

DORK.

> Eventually, I expect you'll learn to trim your articles, of you'll
> find yourself plonked by all of the regular posters here.

Sure,

> M$ has purchased another anti virus application. I expect, within
> a year or two, they will give up trying to maintain it, just like
> they did before, with MSAV.

religious psycho babble.

> I've gotten so frustrated trying to maintain systems where the
> fools who designed them made the mistake of using M$ software,
> that, yes, I really dislike the company.

Uh oh...
religious psycho babble.

> For you to call me an idiot for blaming m$ for producing crapware,
> instead of good software, just shows who the real idiot is.

Sure... religious psycho babble.

> I find it amusing, that you are afraid to use your real name.

Are you serious with that???

> I'm laughing at your silly reply.

Yeah me too...

> Dave Hodgins
>
> --
> Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email.
> (nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
> use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)

From: The Central Scrutinizer on
Absolutely. Please do what you must...

"Buffalo" <Eric(a)nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hkvdae$mab$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
> The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
> [snip]
>> Hey pal I am the central scrutinizer not you OK. I'll tell you what
>> to trim and what not to trim. You dig?
>
> You truely sound like an ignorant, but arrogant, idiot.
> Buffalo
>
>
From: Bill on
X-No-Archive: Yes

In article <d8f789ef-be90-49ed-b515-9fdfae5a7568(a)o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Michael says...
>
>About 6 days ago my avast AV that I had used for years suddenly
>refused to connect me to its update server.


I guess when it comes to anti-virus, like anything else, you get what you pay
for. That is why I don't use free anti-virus software.

From: Bill on
In article <62aqn5lf9ujc49j2n3vstlqhoq1gub6d8e(a)4ax.com>, FredW says...

>That is a often repeated misunderstanding (or prejudice ?).
>
>Many, many people (millions of users) use Avira Antivir, Avast or AVG
>(all free products) to their complete satisfaction and never have a
>problem.
>
>And did you notice Microsoft Security Essentials, which is another
>*free* anti-virus solution, this time from Microsoft.

Yes, millions do. But it's not prejudice or a misunderstanding. I look at it
this way. If I am using something for free, if it doesn't update I have nothing
to complain about. It was free. But if I am using a paid product, the software
company is more likely to ensure that I get those updates when I'm supposed to.

From: Bill on
X-No-Archive: Yes

In article <d7fqn5dj0f84i6l64d85sm087gatsvl3q6(a)4ax.com>, FredW says...

>I understand your view is "a few years old".

Yeah, well. So am I. And I failed to mention, the primary reason that I don't
use free anti-virus is that NOD32 isn't free.