From: Ryan McGinnis on
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/30/2010 8:14 PM, John McWilliams wrote:

> Ryan-
>
> No need to sign messages; forgers can fake PGP stuff easily, and no one
> checks the origin on usenet anyway.
>
> Also, a sig delimiter is
> dash, dash, space, return; no more, no less.

My client auto-signs. (It's actually quite impossible to forge a PGP
signed message; it may look normal, but it won't decode as valid if you
run it through GPG / PGP. This assumes, of course, that you're
confident of the key that the person you're communicating with is
actually using.)

I think PGP messes with the sig delimiter in order to ensure that the
start and stop of the PGP is clear to the decoding software.

- --
- -Ryan McGinnis
The BIG Storm Picture -- http://bigstormpicture.com
Vortex-2 image licensing at http://vortex-2.com
Getty: http://www.gettyimages.com/search/search.aspx?artist=Ryan+McGinnis

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMU7q1AAoJEIzODkDZ7B1bJxQH/jSS5DKX2MT0Yq/Eryn/blhc
BWMd9JXiqlI4TyO5Mh7VhfZK3W4Z4e+xb0x9LGkHkbirOG8abqHjT6jpsZv7vPVM
WDD4ZMjc2E3zaImibbMGCyeJ7BHhDZandNNluo1GmPsB3PJwIq4zciJ03ny/RdJV
K9CRogLIOmfCNNcUS5LeQJSqYusPqHwSmnBLlbmoXwr7mlb+4RM6Ws2GfonjcuGQ
p2lBnLh4FsNt0AsG7oG0zUD82/qzZxNOzy4zVJYqzTKBdFUlLFdz0w0l71ZDbFg6
zmJ8W8SXsMmfUzkUMyx06/NMEOnkw/8OyBhufDI5tSzJjJQmoyxcGWB8+JNcL0c=
=UfH2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on
Ryan McGinnis <digicana(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd take a different approach: why try to reduce filesize? Storage is
> incredibly cheap and getting cheaper by the hour. If you are not
> shooting RAW, a terabyte drive will hold more photos than you're likely
> to take in your lifetime on a 10MP camera, and they run around $150.

A proper backup concept will cost much more than $150.

-Wolfgang
From: Ryan McGinnis on
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/31/2010 3:42 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
> Ryan McGinnis <digicana(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd take a different approach: why try to reduce filesize? Storage is
>> incredibly cheap and getting cheaper by the hour. If you are not
>> shooting RAW, a terabyte drive will hold more photos than you're likely
>> to take in your lifetime on a 10MP camera, and they run around $150.
>
> A proper backup concept will cost much more than $150.

Depends how you run it. I go with one primary drive and one secondary
drive for temp backups of new stuff. Every month or so I archive the
new stuff to two sets of DVDs, delete it off of the secondary drive, and
place one set of DVDs in a bank vault. DVDs are pretty cheap.


- --
- -Ryan McGinnis
The BIG Storm Picture -- http://bigstormpicture.com
Vortex-2 image licensing at http://vortex-2.com
Getty: http://www.gettyimages.com/search/search.aspx?artist=Ryan+McGinnis

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMVLZNAAoJEIzODkDZ7B1bWyAIAJM63rnRUZceKrZ2sfhmI5dP
RIacFAA8RS7czKP0PB/JfozVfvkgDvyHyPBwcLZOVjc9LOVp06NejN9Cq3J5rDS6
tIXGEQtinHL6xbeXnvcyq7SmCLkG2pBJxNEvFdHtxGI6J/ya0Rl/8krmd9wllAF5
NYNZqPX9jRA4W5L3BfoUMXsXA+PNvhAAX5Yszbu5K8nKbldZ8KcOIG8W0AGLlTOD
7HgQuN9azuDHrjqjXbbb9/bg8CHQbZLUnmojJNV6QfxCD7Q5tETNJbH4ORRor9/e
/WvyhJ7UrL0J1wpcO2qTCGoJVG1LzjCwGXsW9tevEri6QF3tXTBOrXROsv0n5S8=
=jEdx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: Ofnuts on
On 01/08/2010 01:48, Ryan McGinnis wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/31/2010 3:42 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
>> Ryan McGinnis<digicana(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd take a different approach: why try to reduce filesize? Storage is
>>> incredibly cheap and getting cheaper by the hour. If you are not
>>> shooting RAW, a terabyte drive will hold more photos than you're likely
>>> to take in your lifetime on a 10MP camera, and they run around $150.
>>
>> A proper backup concept will cost much more than $150.
>
> Depends how you run it. I go with one primary drive and one secondary
> drive for temp backups of new stuff. Every month or so I archive the
> new stuff to two sets of DVDs, delete it off of the secondary drive, and
> place one set of DVDs in a bank vault. DVDs are pretty cheap.

But not very reliable. Ever tried to read back your oldest ones?

--
Bertrand
From: Ryan McGinnis on
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/31/2010 7:13 PM, Ofnuts wrote:

>> Depends how you run it. I go with one primary drive and one secondary
>> drive for temp backups of new stuff. Every month or so I archive the
>> new stuff to two sets of DVDs, delete it off of the secondary drive, and
>> place one set of DVDs in a bank vault. DVDs are pretty cheap.
>
> But not very reliable. Ever tried to read back your oldest ones?

By the time they are no longer readable (I figure 7 to 10 years from
burn date) it will be time to shift to a new format. Digital storage is
not like film; you don't store it in one form for the entire lifetime of
the image. CDs move to DVDs, DVDs probably move to Blu-Ray, perhaps one
day it all moves into the cloud (I also have all toned final JPG files
stored in the cloud) -- who know what the future holds. But if floppy
disks and old tape drives teach you anything, it's that you're going to
have to update storage medium with time.

- --
- -Ryan McGinnis
The BIG Storm Picture -- http://bigstormpicture.com
Vortex-2 image licensing at http://vortex-2.com
Getty: http://www.gettyimages.com/search/search.aspx?artist=Ryan+McGinnis

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMVO8MAAoJEIzODkDZ7B1bIfYH/2YA/qH1/oE7QGBEdVsUYcqj
6eYIzKFY5X0WL9d+QcyIp+JQ2wiYUM9RdmiSrumyW1DGyKIBdJ0rUEjNGQHIn95f
IhJJauxbjUnwbfrlmULl5CfC5JuUspj1h53JS788QVje8ih9I3TmhrLcilN2g/B5
qRPA053rLopzhhCmnjwklkzdecYPHiHHMWs16PK38ewnKUcTI2fkhfXqXo695Kfi
eAKhi+mudI8luxh7e+srjgfHP1HUqTbOjK2DsfS7A1D1x8RHkIqDNFhuC/X9N1HP
KYP8PYmzChBAFnhroaLYBzWh+gOQTgi0iUbyvAUFev7VHtA5b8dCyNWZhdesu/o=
=eks0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----