From: Folderol on
Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common
applications are much harder to use than before?
kwrite
krename
k3b
Are the first few that spring to mind :(

--
Will J G
From: Simon J. Rowe on
Folderol wrote:

> Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common
> applications are much harder to use than before?
> kwrite
> krename
> k3b
> Are the first few that spring to mind :(

No, amarok 2 is completely useless and almost unusable compared with 1.4. I
can't say I've had any problems with k3b though.

Simon


From: Neil Ellwood on
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:10:38 +0000, Folderol wrote:

> Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common
> applications are much harder to use than before? kwrite
> krename
> k3b
> Are the first few that spring to mind :(

K3b certainly isn't harder to use than before.
No experience of the other two - I don't use Kde.




--
Neil
Reverse 'r and a' Delete 'l'
From: Bruce Stephens on
"Simon J. Rowe" <srowe(a)mose.org.uk> writes:

[...]

> No, amarok 2 is completely useless and almost unusable compared with
> 1.4.

I'm finding it adequate, but I don't use it much. It seems to have lost
a feature, in that I don't seem to be able to copy a playlist to my MTP
device (which certainly supports playlists, and 1.4 was happy to create
them).
From: Bruce Stephens on
Folderol <folderol(a)ukfsn.org> writes:

> Or does anyone else think that many of the latest versions of common
> applications are much harder to use than before?
> kwrite
> krename
> k3b
> Are the first few that spring to mind :(

Emacs 23 is better than its predecessors, for what it's worth.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Crash/reboot at boot.
Next: OPEN A SECRET