Prev: The BEST psychic video demo you will EVER see!
Next: Finally, Death of the 3.5 inch floppy disk
From: Asazel on 26 Apr 2010 02:44
Herc, I think you're missing a point somewhere here. I think you need to go
back on those pills.

In order to *prove* psychic powers you would need to provide correct answers
to a question that you could not possibly know the answer to.

And there needs to be some agreed method to decide if the answer given is
correct or not. Otherwise the test is meaningless.

So (to use your own example) correctly guessing the colour of someone's cat
is the PERFECT type of question to answer. Presumably you don't know the
colour anyway, and there's a really good way to judge if you're right or
wrong .... look at the cat.

But if you ask questions like "Was Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone" you can
find just as many people to say "yes" as you can to say "no". This is the
worst type of question to ask .. and you asked 10 of them. Not one of the
questions had an answer that people in general could agree on.

Tell me my cat's name, and I'll agree you have psychic powers. I don't have
a million dollars, sorry. If you're so psychic, and can answer questions
that have eluded science and religion for centuries, then a simple cat's
name should be easy.

From: Dingo on 26 Apr 2010 03:29
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:03:30 +1000, "|-|ercules"
<milliondollarfraud(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>Check out this image of Adam asking God if Adam and Eve are real?
>http://www.adatewithjenny.com/adamandeve.jpg
>
>It's way more convincing than oil running down a statue's face.
>
>In this video I ask 10 questions and get 10 spot on answers, JFK was tapped
>"from the right" but there was only one shooter, 5 symptoms of vaccinations
>EXCEPT autism, and homeopathy is a "childish view".
>
>Check out the video, if you think I may have PsYcHiC PoWeRs let James Randi
>know he needs to do a test for the famous $1,000,000.

Posting the same tedious and deluded questions in 3 different (at
least) posts qualifies you as a serial pest and subsequently a prime
and legitimate candidate for public execution.
From: |-|ercules on 26 Apr 2010 03:45
"Asazel" <asazel(a)thegroup.com> wrote in
> Herc, I think you're missing a point somewhere here. I think you need to go
> back on those pills.
>
> In order to *prove* psychic powers you would need to provide correct answers
> to a question that you could not possibly know the answer to.
>
> And there needs to be some agreed method to decide if the answer given is
> correct or not. Otherwise the test is meaningless.
>
> So (to use your own example) correctly guessing the colour of someone's cat
> is the PERFECT type of question to answer. Presumably you don't know the
> colour anyway, and there's a really good way to judge if you're right or
> wrong .... look at the cat.
>
> But if you ask questions like "Was Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone" you can
> find just as many people to say "yes" as you can to say "no". This is the
> worst type of question to ask .. and you asked 10 of them. Not one of the
> questions had an answer that people in general could agree on.
>
> Tell me my cat's name, and I'll agree you have psychic powers. I don't have
> a million dollars, sorry. If you're so psychic, and can answer questions
> that have eluded science and religion for centuries, then a simple cat's
> name should be easy.

The channels have to serve a purpose. It won't be tested just for the sake
of proving itself.

But it will respond in close to English answers on topic and in context. It's not
that hard to do some stats on how often a random quote should address
a question or not.

It's not that difficult, as anything you really want to know, see if the answer
is in context with the question.

A double blind setup is quite possible too. You have to pick which answers
came from me and which came from a control. My answers are obviously answers.

Herc
From: |-|ercules on 26 Apr 2010 03:46
"Dingo" <dingo963(a)yahoo.com> wrote
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:03:30 +1000, "|-|ercules"
> <milliondollarfraud(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Check out this image of Adam asking God if Adam and Eve are real?
>>http://www.adatewithjenny.com/adamandeve.jpg
>>
>>It's way more convincing than oil running down a statue's face.
>>
>>In this video I ask 10 questions and get 10 spot on answers, JFK was tapped
>>"from the right" but there was only one shooter, 5 symptoms of vaccinations
>>EXCEPT autism, and homeopathy is a "childish view".
>>
>>Check out the video, if you think I may have PsYcHiC PoWeRs let James Randi
>>know he needs to do a test for the famous $1,000,000.
>
> Posting the same tedious and deluded questions in 3 different (at
> least) posts qualifies you as a serial pest and subsequently a prime
> and legitimate candidate for public execution.


You were never chosen as a hall monitor were you?

Herc
From: SG1 on 26 Apr 2010 06:50

"Dingo" <dingo963(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:s1gat5l8204o49v221moqm52vinu9gu5l4(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:03:30 +1000, "|-|ercules"
> <milliondollarfraud(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Check out this image of Adam asking God if Adam and Eve are real?
>>http://www.adatewithjenny.com/adamandeve.jpg
>>
>>It's way more convincing than oil running down a statue's face.
>>
>>In this video I ask 10 questions and get 10 spot on answers, JFK was
>>tapped
>>"from the right" but there was only one shooter, 5 symptoms of
>>vaccinations
>>EXCEPT autism, and homeopathy is a "childish view".
>>
>>Check out the video, if you think I may have PsYcHiC PoWeRs let James
>>Randi
>>know he needs to do a test for the famous $1,000,000.
>
> Posting the same tedious and deluded questions in 3 different (at
> least) posts qualifies you as a serial pest and subsequently a prime
> and legitimate candidate for public execution.

Can I have a tinfoil hat so Herc can't reach me.



First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: The BEST psychic video demo you will EVER see!
Next: Finally, Death of the 3.5 inch floppy disk