From: Cliff on
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:12:55 -0700 (PDT), Joe788 <larryrozer(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>Talk talk, talk and talk
>Talk talk, sweet talk
>Talk talk, tough talk
>Talk talk, dirty talk
>Talk talk, walk and talk
>Talk talk, big talk
>
>Talk talk, talk and talk
>Talk talk, smooth talk
>Talk talk, body talk
>Talk talk, back talk
>Talk talk, small talk
>Talk talk, baby talk
>Talk talk, peace talk
>Talk talk, bullshit

Yer new meds not working out, eh?
--
Cliff
From: Joe788 on
On Apr 9, 2:37 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:12:55 -0700 (PDT), Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Talk talk, talk and talk
> >Talk talk, sweet talk
> >Talk talk, tough talk
> >Talk talk, dirty talk
> >Talk talk, walk and talk
> >Talk talk, big talk
>
> >Talk talk, talk and talk
> >Talk talk, smooth talk
> >Talk talk, body talk
> >Talk talk, back talk
> >Talk talk, small talk
> >Talk talk, baby talk
> >Talk talk, peace talk
> >Talk talk, bullshit
>
>   Yer new meds not working out, eh?
> --
> Cliff

LOL! I don't even know what to make of Jon's new problem.
From: Cliff on
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT), Joe788 <joemama788(a)aol.com> wrote:

>On Apr 9, 2:37�am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:12:55 -0700 (PDT), Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >Talk talk, talk and talk
>> >Talk talk, sweet talk
>> >Talk talk, tough talk
>> >Talk talk, dirty talk
>> >Talk talk, walk and talk
>> >Talk talk, big talk
>>
>> >Talk talk, talk and talk
>> >Talk talk, smooth talk
>> >Talk talk, body talk
>> >Talk talk, back talk
>> >Talk talk, small talk
>> >Talk talk, baby talk
>> >Talk talk, peace talk
>> >Talk talk, bullshit
>>
>> � Yer new meds not working out, eh?
>> --
>> Cliff
>
>LOL! I don't even know what to make of Jon's new problem.

He's a bundle of psychosis wrapped in ads he's clueless about & idiocy.
--
Cliff
From: Cliff on
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:25:00 -0400, Cliff
<Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:

> How jb got there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWcc2hCwsWM
>
>>
>> He was indeed pegged as utterly clueless & full of BS right off.

http://www.vx.com/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=5&threadid=808&highlight_key=y
[
I was never impressed with Autodesk Inventor.

For sure I am now...

... direct modeling and with much stronger 2 1/2 axis milling ....

... Based on my two years of working in Qualcomm's machine shop where we used
Mastercam exclusively for machining, I'm convinced that Mastercam takes far too
much time to create 2 1/2 axis mill programs ....

] - Yonnie (bunko) Bonkers

Not a VX user, cannot reply to questions, too utterly clueless .. just posting
ads.
Cannot use MasterCam either.

"(A Mastercam solid can only be one color.)" - Yonnie (bunko) Bonkers

It's one entity, right?

"My impression was that feature based machining in Mastercam .." - Yonnie
(bunko) Bonkers

IOW he's never used it.

" ... something as simple as solid drilling it failed and failed miserably.
...."

http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10

.187 is NOT the same as .1875 or .1865 or .1873!!
And when you have two differently sized holes selecting
a large one with a + selection tolerance will not find the
smaller ones. But if you select a smaller one it may find the larger
ones.
Naturally these may be selected as multiple sets ...
http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=14

"Mask on arc" works just fine for the non-clueless.
And nobody that does not know simple things such as
1875 > 1873 has any business pretending to be a programmer
of any sort.

He STILL has no clues !!!
--
Cliff
From: Cliff on
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:41:15 -0400, Cliff
<Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:

>On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:25:00 -0400, Cliff
><Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> How jb got there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWcc2hCwsWM
>>
>>>
>>> He was indeed pegged as utterly clueless & full of BS right off.
>
> http://www.vx.com/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=5&threadid=808&highlight_key=y
>[
>I was never impressed with Autodesk Inventor.
>
>For sure I am now...
>
> ... direct modeling and with much stronger 2 1/2 axis milling ....
>
> ... Based on my two years of working in Qualcomm's machine shop where we used
>Mastercam exclusively for machining, I'm convinced that Mastercam takes far too
>much time to create 2 1/2 axis mill programs ....
>
>] - Yonnie (bunko) Bonkers
>
> Not a VX user, cannot reply to questions, too utterly clueless .. just posting
>ads.
> Cannot use MasterCam either.
>
> "(A Mastercam solid can only be one color.)" - Yonnie (bunko) Bonkers
>
> It's one entity, right?
>
> "My impression was that feature based machining in Mastercam .." - Yonnie
>(bunko) Bonkers
>
> IOW he's never used it.
>
> " ... something as simple as solid drilling it failed and failed miserably.
>..."
>
> http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10
>
> .187 is NOT the same as .1875 or .1865 or .1873!!
> And when you have two differently sized holes selecting
>a large one with a + selection tolerance will not find the
>smaller ones. But if you select a smaller one it may find the larger
>ones.
> Naturally these may be selected as multiple sets ...
> http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=14
>
> "Mask on arc" works just fine for the non-clueless.
> And nobody that does not know simple things such as
>1875 > 1873 has any business pretending to be a programmer
>of any sort.
>
> He STILL has no clues !!!

Looks like they chased hm out of http://www.vx.com/forum/
too, with just a few simple questions (he had no clues, as usual).
JonBanquer ..... gone (or banned).
--
Cliff