LHC Math gives a Doomsday.
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 2 Jan 2010 13:23 On Jan 1, 1:48 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 31 2009, 10:56 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 30, 10:26 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 30, 6:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 29, 11:40 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > How do you know that a LHC salesman is lying? His lips are moving.. > > > > > > They tell the blind Aunty-Als, relax sweety it's done before through > > > > > cosmic rays. > > > > > > Then further discretely away say NEVER before since the Big Bang. > > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays which like LHC's > > > > > Alice generate kinetic Energy, LHC's Atlas will be converting it to > > > > > 100% potential energy. > > > > > What? No. Where did you read such nonsense? > > > > You do even know the difference between Alice and Atlas experiments, > > > get educated. > > > Yes, I do. Where did you read such nonsense? > > The only nonsense is your education. Get educated about the difference > when total collision momentum = zero and when it is not. What do you think is different about the two, in terms of physical impact. After all, ANY collision can be observed in two different frames, even the head-on impact of cars. > > > > > > Oh and I know your answer, "Alice is a static collision". > > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be > > > > > generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core. > > > > > So do cosmic rays, at the point of collision. > > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays > > > > > don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state) > > > > > where as Alice and Aunty-Al will. > > > > > Cosmic rays do the same thing. > > > > > > How many lies until Aunty-Al & others stop trusting LHC? > > |