PKL SCC Manager Update available !
in [Visual Objects]
|
From: Geoff Schaller on 17 Jun 2010 18:48 Ok, this is me being real picky now but... These are usability comments from two guys who use a lot of Dot net tools and are just looking at the 'professionalism' side of things so assume this is just finesse: 1. When a project is chosen the refresh button automatically pressed yet when you change a check box, it is not. Hence if you choose a project first (the natural thing to do) you have to wait 30 seconds whilst the treeview is built only to discover the checked options are inappropriate. I think you should force the user to press refresh when they have chosen all options. 2. At the start, the icon counters should not be shown. Especially the 0 count. It is just untidy. They should appear as they are discovered and populated with a count from the project walk. 3. When any check box is changed and/or the project is changed, the treeview and icons should be cleared. 4. Ok, the STOP question is annoying <g>. Just get rid of it. We press stop for a reason. There would be no grounds to stop and restart so it is redundant. Totally. 5. Get rid of the Process Finished message. It is redundant. We know it is finished. It is especially annoying when you press the stop button because now you get two dialogs <g>. 6. When the process is complete, remove the progress bar or reset it. You can replace this with a fixed text if you like which announces: 'Processing Complete' or 'Processing Interrupted'. 7. Storing preferences in the registry is a no-no. Can you change this to a cfg file in the user data folder please? I wasn't aware you were doing this. Alternately, what is the key under which you are storing this? Thanks, Geoff "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message news:87v62hFp8rU1(a)mid.individual.net: > Hi Geoff, > > Thanks for your feedback. > > Below my answers : > > - Suggestion applied in the new version > > - Concerning the question when you press the stop button, it's > useful if you want to "get latest version" but finally decide to > continue the process > > - For the tick "auto get latest version", it seems better to let > it checked : some users just use this app to get latest and this > option is stored in Registry and read when you restart the app. > > - For the enhancement, just tick both checkboxes ! > > - Bug resolved > > Changelog and wew version 1.4.1 ready for download at > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > -- > Phil Mermod > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > > > Very nice! > > > > One small suggestion though. Once a 'get latest' is done, I > > think you should delete that item from the treeview. So if I > > have ticked them all (a very nice feature) and press the > > button, nothing will be left. You can even remove the root > > item if there are no aef's because there is no point it being > > there. The tree view icons are great. I also think that if you > > have ticked the first and last options and also get latest as > > the treeview is to be built, I would suggest that it would > > then only show the checked out modules. > > > > A cosmetic suggestion. Can you move your legend items a little > > further to the left please? A cosmetic suggestion. Pressing > > the STOP should just stop - there is no reason to ask. No-one > > accidentally presses such a button and it doesn't matter if > > they do. A cosmetic suggestion. The tick for auto get latest > > should self-untick once the operation is complete. An > > enhancement request. Using it quite a bit I find I always have > > to do two runs: changes and checkouts. Can I have another tick > > which combines the first two check boxes? (or just do it). I > > would contend that most people would want to know both things > > all the time anyway. > > > > Now a bug. If I filter on checked out modules and only > > applications containing modules, no filtering takes place. I > > get all modules of all aef's. It works correctly for changed > > modules. > > > > But gee... for anyone using VSS this is a great adjunct. My > > boys are using this already! They no longer ring me to ask if > > there are modules to import, they now just run this tool. > > > > Great stuff. > > > > Geoff > > > > > > > > "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > > news:87rf79F4i0U1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > > > > Hi VO and SCC (VSS) users, > > > > > > Updated version of PKL SCC Manager available ! > > > > > > Changes, instructions and download are available at > > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > > > > All feedbacks are welcome ! > > > > > > -- > > > Phil Mermod > > > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/
From: Philippe Mermod on 17 Jun 2010 20:16 I will take a look and let you know... -- Phil Mermod Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ Geoff Schaller wrote: > Ok, this is me being real picky now but... > > These are usability comments from two guys who use a lot of > Dot net tools and are just looking at the 'professionalism' > side of things so assume this is just finesse: > > 1. When a project is chosen the refresh button automatically > pressed yet when you change a check box, it is not. Hence if > you choose a project first (the natural thing to do) you have > to wait 30 seconds whilst the treeview is built only to > discover the checked options are inappropriate. I think you > should force the user to press refresh when they have chosen > all options. > > 2. At the start, the icon counters should not be shown. > Especially the 0 count. It is just untidy. They should appear > as they are discovered and populated with a count from the > project walk. > > 3. When any check box is changed and/or the project is > changed, the treeview and icons should be cleared. > > 4. Ok, the STOP question is annoying <g>. Just get rid of it. > We press stop for a reason. There would be no grounds to stop > and restart so it is redundant. Totally. > > 5. Get rid of the Process Finished message. It is redundant. > We know it is finished. It is especially annoying when you > press the stop button because now you get two dialogs <g>. > > 6. When the process is complete, remove the progress bar or > reset it. You can replace this with a fixed text if you like > which announces: 'Processing Complete' or 'Processing > Interrupted'. > > 7. Storing preferences in the registry is a no-no. Can you > change this to a cfg file in the user data folder please? I > wasn't aware you were doing this. Alternately, what is the key > under which you are storing this? > > Thanks, > > Geoff > > > "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > news:87v62hFp8rU1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > Hi Geoff, > > > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > > Below my answers : > > > > - Suggestion applied in the new version > > > > - Concerning the question when you press the stop button, > > it's useful if you want to "get latest version" but finally > > decide to continue the process > > > > - For the tick "auto get latest version", it seems better to > > let it checked : some users just use this app to get latest > > and this option is stored in Registry and read when you > > restart the app. > > > > - For the enhancement, just tick both checkboxes ! > > > > - Bug resolved > > > > Changelog and wew version 1.4.1 ready for download at > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > > > > -- > > Phil Mermod > > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > > > > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > > > > >> Very nice! > > > > >> One small suggestion though. Once a 'get latest' is done, I > >> think you should delete that item from the treeview. So if I > >> have ticked them all (a very nice feature) and press the > >> button, nothing will be left. You can even remove the root > >> item if there are no aef's because there is no point it > being >> there. The tree view icons are great. I also think > that if you >> have ticked the first and last options and also > get latest as >> the treeview is to be built, I would suggest > that it would >> then only show the checked out modules. > > > > >> A cosmetic suggestion. Can you move your legend items a > little >> further to the left please? A cosmetic suggestion. > Pressing >> the STOP should just stop - there is no reason to > ask. No-one >> accidentally presses such a button and it > doesn't matter if >> they do. A cosmetic suggestion. The tick > for auto get latest >> should self-untick once the operation > is complete. An >> enhancement request. Using it quite a bit > I find I always have >> to do two runs: changes and checkouts. > Can I have another tick >> which combines the first two check > boxes? (or just do it). I >> would contend that most people > would want to know both things >> all the time anyway. > > > > >> Now a bug. If I filter on checked out modules and only > >> applications containing modules, no filtering takes place. I > >> get all modules of all aef's. It works correctly for changed > >> modules. > > > > >> But gee... for anyone using VSS this is a great adjunct. My > >> boys are using this already! They no longer ring me to ask > if >> there are modules to import, they now just run this tool. > > > > >> Great stuff. > > > > >> Geoff > > > > > > > > > > >> "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > >> news:87rf79F4i0U1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > > > > >> > Hi VO and SCC (VSS) users, > >> > > >> > Updated version of PKL SCC Manager available ! > >> > > >> > Changes, instructions and download are available at > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > >> > > >> > All feedbacks are welcome ! > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Phil Mermod > >> > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/
From: Geoff Schaller on 17 Jun 2010 22:26 Phil. Found two significant bugs. 1) You don't check that the AEF options have changed so it picks up all the MEFs but not the options. Thus if I change library linkages (for example), it fails to pick this and the project will not compile. VO correctly detects this when you open VO. Remember that the options is a completely different object to inspect and options can change without modules changing. 2) The process does not detect missing modules (ie new ones added). I suspect this is related to (1) above and I am not entirely sure what you should do about it. Perhaps provide a button to do a get latest at the AEF level rather than the MEF level. In point of fact, that is how we prefer to work. When there are module changes we just do a get latest on the AEF, not the individual MEF. It is just as fast and makes sure we get related and new modules. You will see my classes also generate a template of the project (MEFs involved) and I used that to detect when modules had been deleted and added. Actually, deleting modules is a whole other problem.... Geoff "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message news:87vs6vFobjU1(a)mid.individual.net: > I will take a look and let you know... > > -- > Phil Mermod > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > > > Ok, this is me being real picky now but... > > > > These are usability comments from two guys who use a lot of > > Dot net tools and are just looking at the 'professionalism' > > side of things so assume this is just finesse: > > > > 1. When a project is chosen the refresh button automatically > > pressed yet when you change a check box, it is not. Hence if > > you choose a project first (the natural thing to do) you have > > to wait 30 seconds whilst the treeview is built only to > > discover the checked options are inappropriate. I think you > > should force the user to press refresh when they have chosen > > all options. > > > > 2. At the start, the icon counters should not be shown. > > Especially the 0 count. It is just untidy. They should appear > > as they are discovered and populated with a count from the > > project walk. > > > > 3. When any check box is changed and/or the project is > > changed, the treeview and icons should be cleared. > > > > 4. Ok, the STOP question is annoying <g>. Just get rid of it. > > We press stop for a reason. There would be no grounds to stop > > and restart so it is redundant. Totally. > > > > 5. Get rid of the Process Finished message. It is redundant. > > We know it is finished. It is especially annoying when you > > press the stop button because now you get two dialogs <g>. > > > > 6. When the process is complete, remove the progress bar or > > reset it. You can replace this with a fixed text if you like > > which announces: 'Processing Complete' or 'Processing > > Interrupted'. > > > > 7. Storing preferences in the registry is a no-no. Can you > > change this to a cfg file in the user data folder please? I > > wasn't aware you were doing this. Alternately, what is the key > > under which you are storing this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Geoff > > > > > > "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > > news:87v62hFp8rU1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > > > > Hi Geoff, > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > > > > Below my answers : > > > > > > - Suggestion applied in the new version > > > > > > - Concerning the question when you press the stop button, > > > it's useful if you want to "get latest version" but finally > > > decide to continue the process > > > > > > - For the tick "auto get latest version", it seems better to > > > let it checked : some users just use this app to get latest > > > and this option is stored in Registry and read when you > > > restart the app. > > > > > > - For the enhancement, just tick both checkboxes ! > > > > > > - Bug resolved > > > > > > Changelog and wew version 1.4.1 ready for download at > > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Phil Mermod > > > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > > > > > > > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Very nice! > > > > > > >> One small suggestion though. Once a 'get latest' is done, I > > >> think you should delete that item from the treeview. So if I > > >> have ticked them all (a very nice feature) and press the > > >> button, nothing will be left. You can even remove the root > > >> item if there are no aef's because there is no point it > > > being >> there. The tree view icons are great. I also think > > that if you >> have ticked the first and last options and also > > get latest as >> the treeview is to be built, I would suggest > > that it would >> then only show the checked out modules. > > > > > > > >> A cosmetic suggestion. Can you move your legend items a > > > little >> further to the left please? A cosmetic suggestion. > > Pressing >> the STOP should just stop - there is no reason to > > ask. No-one >> accidentally presses such a button and it > > doesn't matter if >> they do. A cosmetic suggestion. The tick > > for auto get latest >> should self-untick once the operation > > is complete. An >> enhancement request. Using it quite a bit > > I find I always have >> to do two runs: changes and checkouts. > > Can I have another tick >> which combines the first two check > > boxes? (or just do it). I >> would contend that most people > > would want to know both things >> all the time anyway. > > > > > > > >> Now a bug. If I filter on checked out modules and only > > >> applications containing modules, no filtering takes place. I > > >> get all modules of all aef's. It works correctly for changed > > >> modules. > > > > > > >> But gee... for anyone using VSS this is a great adjunct. My > > >> boys are using this already! They no longer ring me to ask > > > if >> there are modules to import, they now just run this tool. > > > > > > > >> Great stuff. > > > > > > >> Geoff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > > >> news:87rf79F4i0U1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi VO and SCC (VSS) users, > > >> > > > >> > Updated version of PKL SCC Manager available ! > > >> > > > >> > Changes, instructions and download are available at > > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > >> > > > >> > All feedbacks are welcome ! > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Phil Mermod > > >> > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/
From: Philippe Mermod on 18 Jun 2010 08:07 Hi, 1. This won't be implemented in short term as our aef's are disconnected in the projects 2. Can you give more details. I created a new module in an application. It's listed in the process as basic module (not under SCC). Then I added to VSS : during the process, it's listed as under SCC (checked-in or checked-out) -- Phil Mermod Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ Geoff Schaller wrote: > Phil. > > Found two significant bugs. > > 1) You don't check that the AEF options have changed so it > picks up all the MEFs but not the options. Thus if I change > library linkages (for example), it fails to pick this and the > project will not compile. VO correctly detects this when you > open VO. Remember that the options is a completely different > object to inspect and options can change without modules > changing. > > 2) The process does not detect missing modules (ie new ones > added). I suspect this is related to (1) above and I am not > entirely sure what you should do about it. Perhaps provide a > button to do a get latest at the AEF level rather than the MEF > level. > > In point of fact, that is how we prefer to work. When there > are module changes we just do a get latest on the AEF, not the > individual MEF. It is just as fast and makes sure we get > related and new modules. You will see my classes also generate > a template of the project (MEFs involved) and I used that to > detect when modules had been deleted and added. > > Actually, deleting modules is a whole other problem.... > > Geoff > > > "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > news:87vs6vFobjU1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > I will take a look and let you know... > > > > -- > > Phil Mermod > > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > > > > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, this is me being real picky now but... > > > > >> These are usability comments from two guys who use a lot of > >> Dot net tools and are just looking at the 'professionalism' > >> side of things so assume this is just finesse: > > > > >> 1. When a project is chosen the refresh button automatically > >> pressed yet when you change a check box, it is not. Hence if > >> you choose a project first (the natural thing to do) you > have >> to wait 30 seconds whilst the treeview is built only to > >> discover the checked options are inappropriate. I think you > >> should force the user to press refresh when they have chosen > >> all options. > > > > >> 2. At the start, the icon counters should not be shown. > >> Especially the 0 count. It is just untidy. They should > appear >> as they are discovered and populated with a count > from the >> project walk. > > > > >> 3. When any check box is changed and/or the project is > >> changed, the treeview and icons should be cleared. > > > > >> 4. Ok, the STOP question is annoying <g>. Just get rid of > it. >> We press stop for a reason. There would be no grounds > to stop >> and restart so it is redundant. Totally. > > > > >> 5. Get rid of the Process Finished message. It is redundant. > >> We know it is finished. It is especially annoying when you > >> press the stop button because now you get two dialogs <g>. > > > > >> 6. When the process is complete, remove the progress bar or > >> reset it. You can replace this with a fixed text if you like > >> which announces: 'Processing Complete' or 'Processing > >> Interrupted'. > > > > >> 7. Storing preferences in the registry is a no-no. Can you > >> change this to a cfg file in the user data folder please? I > >> wasn't aware you were doing this. Alternately, what is the > key >> under which you are storing this? > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> Geoff > > > > > > > >> "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > >> news:87v62hFp8rU1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > > > > >> > Hi Geoff, > >> > > >> > Thanks for your feedback. > >> > > >> > Below my answers : > >> > > >> > - Suggestion applied in the new version > >> > > >> > - Concerning the question when you press the stop button, > >> > it's useful if you want to "get latest version" but > finally >> > decide to continue the process > >> > > >> > - For the tick "auto get latest version", it seems better > to >> > let it checked : some users just use this app to get > latest >> > and this option is stored in Registry and read > when you >> > restart the app. > >> > > >> > - For the enhancement, just tick both checkboxes ! > >> > > >> > - Bug resolved > >> > > >> > Changelog and wew version 1.4.1 ready for download at > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Phil Mermod > >> > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > >> > > >> > > >> > Geoff Schaller wrote: > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> Very nice! > >> > > > >> >> One small suggestion though. Once a 'get latest' is > done, I >> >> think you should delete that item from the > treeview. So if I >> >> have ticked them all (a very nice > feature) and press the >> >> button, nothing will be left. You > can even remove the root >> >> item if there are no aef's > because there is no point it > > > >> being >> there. The tree view icons are great. I also think > >> that if you >> have ticked the first and last options and > also >> get latest as >> the treeview is to be built, I would > suggest >> that it would >> then only show the checked out > modules. > > > >> > > > >> >> A cosmetic suggestion. Can you move your legend items a > > > >> little >> further to the left please? A cosmetic > suggestion. >> Pressing >> the STOP should just stop - there > is no reason to >> ask. No-one >> accidentally presses such a > button and it >> doesn't matter if >> they do. A cosmetic > suggestion. The tick >> for auto get latest >> should > self-untick once the operation >> is complete. An >> > enhancement request. Using it quite a bit >> I find I always > have >> to do two runs: changes and checkouts. >> Can I have > another tick >> which combines the first two check >> boxes? > (or just do it). I >> would contend that most people >> would > want to know both things >> all the time anyway. > > > >> > > > >> >> Now a bug. If I filter on checked out modules and only > >> >> applications containing modules, no filtering takes > place. I >> >> get all modules of all aef's. It works > correctly for changed >> >> modules. > >> > > > >> >> But gee... for anyone using VSS this is a great adjunct. > My >> >> boys are using this already! They no longer ring me > to ask > > > >> if >> there are modules to import, they now just run this > tool. > > > >> > > > >> >> Great stuff. > >> > > > >> >> Geoff > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > >> >> news:87rf79F4i0U1(a)mid.individual.net: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > Hi VO and SCC (VSS) users, > >> >> > > >> >> > Updated version of PKL SCC Manager available ! > >> >> > > >> >> > Changes, instructions and download are available at > >> >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > >> >> > > >> >> > All feedbacks are welcome ! > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Phil Mermod > >> >> > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > >> >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/
From: Geoff Schaller on 19 Jun 2010 06:04
Phil, (1) is easy - you just need to call the check for the Options. And this is very important because applications will not compile if the library list, UDC list or other things are not correct. (2) is also easy to duplicate. On one PC, create a new MEF and add to source control. Check in. Go to a second PC and run your tool. It does not detect the module. Same goes if you delete a module. The deletion is not detected and if you've moved the module to another application you end up with all sorts of duplicated class errors. What we do when we add/delete modules is to touch the options to force the developer to do a get latest on the AEF. Then all such macro changes are picked up. Cheers, Geoff "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message news:8815r9FkvuU1(a)mid.individual.net: > Hi, > > 1. This won't be implemented in short term as our aef's are > disconnected in the projects > > 2. Can you give more details. I created a new module in an > application. It's listed in the process as basic module (not > under SCC). Then I added to VSS : during the process, it's > listed as under SCC (checked-in or checked-out) > > -- > Phil Mermod > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > > > Phil. > > > > Found two significant bugs. > > > > 1) You don't check that the AEF options have changed so it > > picks up all the MEFs but not the options. Thus if I change > > library linkages (for example), it fails to pick this and the > > project will not compile. VO correctly detects this when you > > open VO. Remember that the options is a completely different > > object to inspect and options can change without modules > > changing. > > > > 2) The process does not detect missing modules (ie new ones > > added). I suspect this is related to (1) above and I am not > > entirely sure what you should do about it. Perhaps provide a > > button to do a get latest at the AEF level rather than the MEF > > level. > > > > In point of fact, that is how we prefer to work. When there > > are module changes we just do a get latest on the AEF, not the > > individual MEF. It is just as fast and makes sure we get > > related and new modules. You will see my classes also generate > > a template of the project (MEFs involved) and I used that to > > detect when modules had been deleted and added. > > > > Actually, deleting modules is a whole other problem.... > > > > Geoff > > > > > > "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > > news:87vs6vFobjU1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > > > > I will take a look and let you know... > > > > > > -- > > > Phil Mermod > > > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > > > > > > > > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Ok, this is me being real picky now but... > > > > > > >> These are usability comments from two guys who use a lot of > > >> Dot net tools and are just looking at the 'professionalism' > > >> side of things so assume this is just finesse: > > > > > > >> 1. When a project is chosen the refresh button automatically > > >> pressed yet when you change a check box, it is not. Hence if > > >> you choose a project first (the natural thing to do) you > > > have >> to wait 30 seconds whilst the treeview is built only to > > > >> discover the checked options are inappropriate. I think you > > >> should force the user to press refresh when they have chosen > > >> all options. > > > > > > >> 2. At the start, the icon counters should not be shown. > > >> Especially the 0 count. It is just untidy. They should > > > appear >> as they are discovered and populated with a count > > from the >> project walk. > > > > > > > >> 3. When any check box is changed and/or the project is > > >> changed, the treeview and icons should be cleared. > > > > > > >> 4. Ok, the STOP question is annoying <g>. Just get rid of > > > it. >> We press stop for a reason. There would be no grounds > > to stop >> and restart so it is redundant. Totally. > > > > > > > >> 5. Get rid of the Process Finished message. It is redundant. > > >> We know it is finished. It is especially annoying when you > > >> press the stop button because now you get two dialogs <g>. > > > > > > >> 6. When the process is complete, remove the progress bar or > > >> reset it. You can replace this with a fixed text if you like > > >> which announces: 'Processing Complete' or 'Processing > > >> Interrupted'. > > > > > > >> 7. Storing preferences in the registry is a no-no. Can you > > >> change this to a cfg file in the user data folder please? I > > >> wasn't aware you were doing this. Alternately, what is the > > > key >> under which you are storing this? > > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > > >> Geoff > > > > > > > > > > >> "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > > >> news:87v62hFp8rU1(a)mid.individual.net: > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Geoff, > > >> > > > >> > Thanks for your feedback. > > >> > > > >> > Below my answers : > > >> > > > >> > - Suggestion applied in the new version > > >> > > > >> > - Concerning the question when you press the stop button, > > >> > it's useful if you want to "get latest version" but > > > finally >> > decide to continue the process > > > >> > > > >> > - For the tick "auto get latest version", it seems better > > > to >> > let it checked : some users just use this app to get > > latest >> > and this option is stored in Registry and read > > when you >> > restart the app. > > > >> > > > >> > - For the enhancement, just tick both checkboxes ! > > >> > > > >> > - Bug resolved > > >> > > > >> > Changelog and wew version 1.4.1 ready for download at > > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Phil Mermod > > >> > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Geoff Schaller wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> Very nice! > > >> > > > > >> >> One small suggestion though. Once a 'get latest' is > > > done, I >> >> think you should delete that item from the > > treeview. So if I >> >> have ticked them all (a very nice > > feature) and press the >> >> button, nothing will be left. You > > can even remove the root >> >> item if there are no aef's > > because there is no point it > > > > > > > >> being >> there. The tree view icons are great. I also think > > >> that if you >> have ticked the first and last options and > > > also >> get latest as >> the treeview is to be built, I would > > suggest >> that it would >> then only show the checked out > > modules. > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> A cosmetic suggestion. Can you move your legend items a > > > > > > >> little >> further to the left please? A cosmetic > > > suggestion. >> Pressing >> the STOP should just stop - there > > is no reason to >> ask. No-one >> accidentally presses such a > > button and it >> doesn't matter if >> they do. A cosmetic > > suggestion. The tick >> for auto get latest >> should > > self-untick once the operation >> is complete. An >> > > enhancement request. Using it quite a bit >> I find I always > > have >> to do two runs: changes and checkouts. >> Can I have > > another tick >> which combines the first two check >> boxes? > > (or just do it). I >> would contend that most people >> would > > want to know both things >> all the time anyway. > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> Now a bug. If I filter on checked out modules and only > > >> >> applications containing modules, no filtering takes > > > place. I >> >> get all modules of all aef's. It works > > correctly for changed >> >> modules. > > > >> > > > > >> >> But gee... for anyone using VSS this is a great adjunct. > > > My >> >> boys are using this already! They no longer ring me > > to ask > > > > > > > >> if >> there are modules to import, they now just run this > > > tool. > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> >> Great stuff. > > >> > > > > >> >> Geoff > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> "Philippe Mermod" <pmermod(a)REMOVEpkl.ch> wrote in message > > >> >> news:87rf79F4i0U1(a)mid.individual.net: > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > Hi VO and SCC (VSS) users, > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Updated version of PKL SCC Manager available ! > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Changes, instructions and download are available at > > >> >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ > > >> >> > > > >> >> > All feedbacks are welcome ! > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > Phil Mermod > > >> >> > Crystal Reports Library for Visual Objects > > >> >> > http://www.pkl.ch/dev/ |