From: mmyvusenet on
Hola:

Today I took this photo about this memory:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4319420908/

Thanks for the technical comments about photography.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com


From: Irwell on
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:24:39 -0500, mmyvusenet wrote:

> Hola:
>
> Today I took this photo about this memory:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4319420908/
>
> Thanks for the technical comments about photography.

Take a look at this thread, there is a camera similar
to it.
From: Rich on
On Jan 31, 2:24 pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Hola:
>
> Today I took this photo about this memory:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4319420908/
>
> Thanks for the technical comments about photography.
>
> --
> MMYVhttp://www.mmyv.com

It's kind of boring. Sitting on some cheap melamine shelving. Clean
it up with q-tips and Windex first, it looks dirty. Then shoot it so
that it looks like a product shot. Either blow out a white
background, or find one that looks interesting.
From: bugbear on
Rich wrote:
> Then shoot it so
> that it looks like a product shot.

You mean as uncreative as possible?

BugBear
From: bugbear on
mmyvusenet wrote:
> Hola:
>
> Today I took this photo about this memory:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4319420908/
>
> Thanks for the technical comments about photography.
>

Your lens it at its widest, and this has caused
quite severe spherical abberation, which is
not a good look.

Either learn to post-correct this,
or shoot with longer focal lengths, which
tend to have this abberation to a far lower extent.

BugBear
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: januar 2010
Next: Sigma wide zoom = junk