Prev: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
Next: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
From: Eric J. Holtman on 7 Aug 2010 19:15
TomYoung <sombodee(a)gmail.com> wrote in
news:75b53699-b0ad-4b00-a236-66e3eeec7083(a)u4g2000prn.googlegroups.com:

> Hi all:
>
> Struggling through the process of activating One Step Update for my
> various Schwab accounts frequently leaves me with the feeling that the
> Quicken software coders aren't among the sharpest tools in the shed
> and that Quicken's QC leaves a lot to be desired. But, maybe I'm
> missing something.
>


You're not, and I don't even need to read the rest of your
message to see what you're complaining about.

The product has gone completely downhill since they moved
development overseas.

Like that's shock.

My grandmother could code better and test better, and she's dead.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
Next: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work