Prev: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
Next: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactionsneeds work
From: Eric J. Holtman on 8 Aug 2010 11:01
TomYoung <sombodee(a)gmail.com> wrote in
news:5de4fa21-def5-4386-8c07-23472f14a1c2(a)q21g2000prm.googlegroups.com:

>
> OK, I've got it now. Before I suggest Quicken can improve in any way
> - in ANY way - I have to find a better product in the market, one
> selling at the same price point, that's doing what I want Quicken to
> do. A high bar, indeed.
>


Well, what did you expect, when you tried to argue
with a fundamentalist?
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
Next: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactionsneeds work