| 
			
		 	
		 From: Martin Trump on 7 Dec 2009 07:55 > Nyquist says you need at least two samples per cycle to adequately > recover the waveform. I have to wonder if this thread has gone down a blind alley. As I see it the OP probably wants just the amplitude of the IF strip's output, not to reconstruct the waveform. Just a guess. 	
		 From: Jim Mack on 7 Dec 2009 08:05 		Martin Trump wrote: >> Nyquist says you need at least two samples per cycle to adequately >> recover the waveform. > > I have to wonder if this thread has gone down a blind alley. Or just a side street. Wouldn't be the first one. > As I see it the OP probably wants just the amplitude of the IF > strip's output... I'm sure you're right. The question is, how often does he want to read the amplitude? (-: -- Jim Mack Twisted tees at http://www.cafepress.com/2050inc "We sew confusion" 	
		 From: Martin Trump on 7 Dec 2009 08:26 		>> As I see it the OP probably wants just the amplitude of the IF >> strip's output... > > I'm sure you're right. The question is, how often does he want to read > the amplitude? (-: Good question. Many factors involved but principally the frequency sweep rate of the i/p. I think better the OP should post again and give some more details rather than we hypothesize. Martin 	
		 From: MoiInAust on 7 Dec 2009 23:24 		"Martin Trump" <martin(a)wmeadow.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:oW6Tm.73773$os.65699(a)newsfe25.ams2... > > >> Nyquist says you need at least two samples per cycle to adequately >> recover the waveform. > > I have to wonder if this thread has gone down a blind alley. As I see it > the OP probably wants just the amplitude of the IF strip's output, not to > reconstruct the waveform. Just a guess. Yes, graphing the amplitude against the frequency should give a resonance curve. Eg frequency 455 KHz +- 20 KHz perhaps gives a curve similar to a curve of normal distribution. If there is a crystal or mechnical filter the curve will be much sharper but should be symmetrical if the filter is on frequency. 	
		 From: MoiInAust on 8 Dec 2009 04:19 		"MoiInAust" <user(a)user.com> wrote in message news:4b1dd502$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > > "Martin Trump" <martin(a)wmeadow.demon.co.uk> wrote in message > news:oW6Tm.73773$os.65699(a)newsfe25.ams2... >> >> >>> Nyquist says you need at least two samples per cycle to adequately >>> recover the waveform. >> >> I have to wonder if this thread has gone down a blind alley. As I see it >> the OP probably wants just the amplitude of the IF strip's output, not to >> reconstruct the waveform. Just a guess. > > Yes, graphing the amplitude against the frequency should give a resonance > curve. Eg frequency 455 KHz +- 20 KHz perhaps gives a curve similar to a > curve of normal distribution. If there is a crystal or mechnical filter > the curve will be much sharper but should be symmetrical if the filter is > on frequency. And to answer the other question, the sweep need only be fat enough to give a good stable trace on the oscilloscope/screen, say 50 Hz? 
		 First
 | 
Prev
 | 
Next
 | 
Last
 
		Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Problem VisualBasic exe file to project and form data.... Next: biological query  |