From: Dan on

"Bwig Zomberi" <zomberiMAPSONNOSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hukfsa$hs9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> Dan wrote:
>>
>> "Bwig Zomberi" <zomberiMAPSONNOSPAM(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:huie27$ben$2(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>> Bwig Zomberi wrote:
>>>> Dan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought I'd made it clear enough in my earlier reply, and that you
>>>>> were stating I was wrong, hence the above followup. If you look at my
>>>>> 2
>>>>> examples you can see the difference, and that was my point.
>>>>
>>>> Speed reading. My bad.
>>>>
>>>> ContentType, not DocType, your bad.
>>>>
>>>> Another thing: The PDF ng is comp.text.pdf, not alt.txt.pdf. My bad.
>>>
>>>
>>> Apologies for the bads. Just looked it up. I will promise never to use
>>> it again.
>>>
>>
>> I hope that isn't a promise not to use DOCTYPE declarations in your HTML
>> pages ;)
>>
>
> No, you are right. That was clearly in a different context. I thought you
> suggested doctype for PDF files.

I guess I need to break my replies up a bit more then, but in my defensive I
did put "normal HTML" in the same line :)

It's a shame this newsgroup will be gone soon :(

--
Dan