From: Louis Epstein on
I note that the release notes for BIND 9.6-ESV and 9.7.0-P1
claim it works with FreeBSD 4.10,5.2.1,and 6.2 (those for
the still-patched 9.4-ESV-R1,though it is a newer version
than came with 6.4,only say it works with 6.1).

So are 4.11 and 5.5 and 6.4 and 7.3 and 8.0 and 9-CURRENT
untested by BIND people at ISC?

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
From: Mark Andrews on
In article <hoh6ha$5cj$1(a)reader1.panix.com>,
Louis Epstein <le(a)main.put.com> wrote:
>I note that the release notes for BIND 9.6-ESV and 9.7.0-P1
>claim it works with FreeBSD 4.10,5.2.1,and 6.2 (those for
>the still-patched 9.4-ESV-R1,though it is a newer version
>than came with 6.4,only say it works with 6.1).
>
>So are 4.11 and 5.5 and 6.4 and 7.3 and 8.0 and 9-CURRENT
>untested by BIND people at ISC?

It's tested on FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE. It's developed on FreeBSD
6.4-STABLE and various Linux platforms. There is very little that
is OS specific in BIND and for FreeBSD there is very little is OS
release specific.

Mark
From: Louis Epstein on
Mark Andrews <marka(a)drugs.dv.isc.org> wrote:
: In article <hoh6ha$5cj$1(a)reader1.panix.com>,
: Louis Epstein <le(a)main.put.com> wrote:
:>I note that the release notes for BIND 9.6-ESV and 9.7.0-P1
:>claim it works with FreeBSD 4.10,5.2.1,and 6.2 (those for
:>the still-patched 9.4-ESV-R1,though it is a newer version
:>than came with 6.4,only say it works with 6.1).
:>
:>So are 4.11 and 5.5 and 6.4 and 7.3 and 8.0 and 9-CURRENT
:>untested by BIND people at ISC?
:
: It's tested on FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE. It's developed on FreeBSD
: 6.4-STABLE and various Linux platforms. There is very little that
: is OS specific in BIND and for FreeBSD there is very little is OS
: release specific.

Good to know.
(I have machines running those).
Doc staleness is endemic,just wondering at those arbitrary references.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: devfs confusion
Next: Well, here we go again!