Then end of FF bulk?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Official: Nikon D3s the new benchmark in DSLR low noise capability
Next: Sigma's new 85mm f1.4 re-bodied Samyang optics with AF?
From: J. Clarke on 21 Feb 2010 17:26 On 2/21/2010 3:58 PM, Paul Furman wrote: > R Davis wrote: >>> No photographer wants to >>> be adjusting WB from shot to shot when he should be looking for matter >>> to shoot and how to shoot it. JPG, in the end either leads to errors in >>> WB, lost time, or additional work in post to fix things, with further >>> quality loss because original information was lost in-camera. >> >> Really? No photographer? Let us clarify that, no SNAPSHOOTER wants to >> adjust their camera properly for every shot. > > It is certainly possible to set a custom white balance and change > contrast, saturation, sharpening & exposure compensation in-camera for > every shot, just inconvenient. That depends on how rapidly those shots have to be made in order to get the story. When the airship is burning or the towers are falling it's more important to get _something_ than to miss the shot while you're getting the settings perfect.
From: R Davis on 21 Feb 2010 17:35 On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:26:17 -0500, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote: >On 2/21/2010 3:58 PM, Paul Furman wrote: >> R Davis wrote: >>>> No photographer wants to >>>> be adjusting WB from shot to shot when he should be looking for matter >>>> to shoot and how to shoot it. JPG, in the end either leads to errors in >>>> WB, lost time, or additional work in post to fix things, with further >>>> quality loss because original information was lost in-camera. >>> >>> Really? No photographer? Let us clarify that, no SNAPSHOOTER wants to >>> adjust their camera properly for every shot. >> >> It is certainly possible to set a custom white balance and change >> contrast, saturation, sharpening & exposure compensation in-camera for >> every shot, just inconvenient. > >That depends on how rapidly those shots have to be made in order to get >the story. When the airship is burning or the towers are falling it's >more important to get _something_ than to miss the shot while you're >getting the settings perfect. Tell us again how long it takes you to swap lenses in order to even get that photo in the first place. Ooops, another missed shot! If it wasn't already ruined by sensor dust anyway. Oh well, you're probably used to all those drawbacks by now.
From: Robert Spanjaard on 22 Feb 2010 09:52
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, R Davis wrote: > I still haven't seen > anyone produce a proper granger chart from PhotoSlop using the exact > technique given, the one that works perfectly fine in all other editors. What is the definition of a "proper granger chart", and what is your source for that definition? -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com |