Prev: Chest strap or harness for DSLR while backpacking
Next: wildlife fotos
From: RichA on 23 Sep 2009 16:36
Think again. Here's a $600 Canon Powershot SX1 versus an Olympus
E-620 ($799, two zoom lens kit) at 200 ISO.

http://www.pbase.com/image/117651018



From: John Navas on 23 Sep 2009 23:29
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
wrote in
<af9b092b-92f1-4986-afa5-56af01c609a3(a)p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>:

>[SNIP]

Troll alert!

Please don't feed the troll!

--
Best regards,
John

Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer,
it makes you a dSLR owner.
"The single most important component of a camera
is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: Troll Negator on 24 Sep 2009 00:22
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Think again. Here's a $600 Canon Powershot SX1 versus an Olympus
>E-620 ($799, two zoom lens kit) at 200 ISO.
>
>http://www.pbase.com/image/117651018
>
>

Think that P&S 20x super-zoom lenses suck in resolution and CA performance
compared to an easy to figure and manufacture 3x zoom DSLR lens? Think
again:

http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_SX10_IS/outdoor_results.shtml


Think P&S cameras can't compete with a medium-format Hasselblad, something
that even a DSLR can't do? Think again:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml


Think that DSLR focal-plane shutters aren't a problem? Think again:

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/chdk/images//4/46/Focalplane_shutter_distortions.jpg


Think that teeny 1/2.5 P&S sensors can't have more dynamic range than an
APS-C sized sensor of 7-8 EV stops? Think again:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3142/2861257547_9a7ceaf3a1_o.jpg

From: Rich on 24 Sep 2009 02:16
On Sep 24, 12:22 am, Troll Negator <t...(a)tn.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Think again.  Here's a $600 Canon Powershot SX1 versus an Olympus
> >E-620 ($799, two zoom lens kit) at 200 ISO.
>
> >http://www.pbase.com/image/117651018
>
> Think that P&S 20x super-zoom lenses suck in resolution and CA performance
> compared to an easy to figure and manufacture 3x zoom DSLR lens? Think
> again:
>
> http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_SX10_IS/outdoor_res...
>
> Think P&S cameras can't compete with a medium-format Hasselblad, something
> that even a DSLR can't do? Think again:
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml
>
> Think that DSLR focal-plane shutters aren't a problem? Think again:
>
> http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/chdk/images//4/46/Focalplane_shutte...
>
> Think that teeny 1/2.5 P&S sensors can't have more dynamic range than an
> APS-C sized sensor of 7-8 EV stops? Think again:
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3142/2861257547_9a7ceaf3a1_o.jpg

You can now buy a used DSLR in excellent condition for under $300 with
a kit lens from various sources. I bought a Nikon D100 for $125 a
month ago. What kind of clod would spend $200-$500 on a P&S if their
goal was excellent image quality and not portability?
From: No One on 24 Sep 2009 10:15

"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:af9b092b-92f1-4986-afa5-56af01c609a3(a)p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> Think again. Here's a $600 Canon Powershot SX1 versus an Olympus
> E-620 ($799, two zoom lens kit) at 200 ISO.
>
> http://www.pbase.com/image/117651018
>
So where is the 100% image and the EXIF data?



 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Chest strap or harness for DSLR while backpacking
Next: wildlife fotos