From: Eric Gisin on 13 Nov 2006 13:32
"Arno Wagner" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:4rrbrmFsncs3U2(a)mid.individual.net...
> Previously Doug <DouglasEllicenospam(a)nospamcomcast.net> wrote:
>> Arno Wagner wrote:
>> Yes. I recently had a horribly messed up drive come back completely
>> after running chkdsk. I was stunned by the number of system messages I
>> received as one error after another was corrected. Good things were
>> going on that I'd never even heard of. All because the drive was NTFS
>> instead of FAT.
>> I am now a true believer.
> You mean, because NTFS needs more repairs after a problem than
> FAT, it is more save? That seems counterintuitive to me. Or did
> I misunderstand?
Are you trying to be funny or is it just drugs?