From: George Kerby on



On 7/14/10 1:38 AM, in article
DPGdnRTP1PQaxqDRnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com, "John Sisker"
<jsisker(a)sprynet.com> wrote:

> "Pat" <punisher(a)earthling.net> wrote in message
> news:bb2334ff-61b6-46e3-ad7a-2ecf7a848605(a)s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>> If money wasn't a limitation, what place/s on Earth (or even outside
>> of it) showing in the background, would you most want to take a self-
>> portrait photo in, to show to friends and please say why.
>
>
>
>
> I think Deborah would say France, based on her interest in this country,
> including the people, culture and food. In fact, she can even speak and
> write the language. I on the other hand, would probably say Alaska, simply
> because of the open space and beautiful scenery. Of course, with Photoshop,
> that is easily accomplished in any case. But admittedly, it's not the same
> as actually being there. Yet, I don't feel a self portrait is important of
> me standing in front of anything, as is the fact that I was actually there
> behind the camera taking the picture in the first place.
>
> John Sisker - Huntington Beach, California
>
With a Green Screen anything is possible...

From: Robert Haar on
On 7/14/10 10:04 AM, "otter" <bighorn_bill(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 13, 9:10�pm, C J Campbell
> <christophercampbellremovet...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2010-07-13 17:04:25 -0700, Pat <punis...(a)earthling.net> said:
>>
>>> If money wasn't a limitation, what place/s on Earth (or even outside
>>> of it) showing in the background, would you most want to take a self-
>>> portrait photo in, to show to friends and please say why.
>>
>> Heaven. I think that would be self-explanatory. :D
>
> I think that would be the last place I'd want to be.

Next to last. The other place is the last.