ascii to tword - help
in [ASM]
|
Prev: OctaOS
Next: DIV overflow
From: Guga on 28 Mar 2007 03:46 On Mar 27, 11:25 pm, Herbert Kleebauer <k...(a)unibwm.de> wrote: > Guga wrote: > > > i think i finally got it working.. It seems that the function can > > works without any size multiple of 32 bits. So it seems to be working > > on 32bits, 64 bits, 96 bits, 128 bits and so on. (well.. not sure > > yet.. if it is really working.. i have no way how to check some test > > number) > > > I used the mul routine only. The code is a total mess. so i´ll post it > > here if it is really running ok. > > > In the meanwhile.. can someone pls tell me, if this ascii decimal > > number: "1699504104824251512520704" have the following hexadecimal > > form of: > > > 0167E2__04D586300__00000000 > > Yes, but try it also with a value which generates an overflow: > > 4294967299 > > Why don't you also implement the reverse: binary -> decimal > then you can convert the number back and compare it with > the original number.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - yes... it seems to be working correctly too The number you proposed returned me: 4294967299 = 01__00000003 Best Regards, Guga
From: /o//annabee on 28 Mar 2007 03:46 P� Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:44:35 +0200, skrev /\\o//\annabee <Wannabee(a)thewannabee.org>: > P� Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:12:09 +0200, skrev Guga <GugaGTG(a)gmail.com>: > >> Ok, guys >> >> i think i finally got it working.. It seems that the function can >> works without any size multiple of 32 bits. So it seems to be working >> on 32bits, 64 bits, 96 bits, 128 bits and so on. (well.. not sure >> yet.. if it is really working.. i have no way how to check some test >> number) > > Use Calc. It can do those numbers. woops. No it seems it cant. Sorry. I assumed...
From: Guga on 28 Mar 2007 03:54 On Mar 27, 11:46 pm, /\\\\o//\\annabee <Wanna...(a)thewannabee.org> wrote: > På Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:44:35 +0200, skrev /\\o//\annabee > <Wanna...(a)thewannabee.org>: > > > På Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:12:09 +0200, skrev Guga <Guga...(a)gmail.com>: > > >> Ok, guys > > >> i think i finally got it working.. It seems that the function can > >> works without any size multiple of 32 bits. So it seems to be working > >> on 32bits, 64 bits, 96 bits, 128 bits and so on. (well.. not sure > >> yet.. if it is really working.. i have no way how to check some test > >> number) > > > Use Calc. It can do those numbers. > > woops. No it seems it cant. Sorry. I assumed... Calc is only limited to 64 Bit convertion. Tomorrow i´ll check to see if the result is ok. I can try a binary convertion now to check back to see if it correct, because i´m awfully tired. It´s 5:00 AM here :):):) So... tomorrow i´ll se the results. Best Regards, Guga
From: Herbert Kleebauer on 28 Mar 2007 04:02 Guga wrote: > > The convertion i got from: > 1699504104824251512520704 = 0167E2__04D586300__00000000 > > that is the same as on the site. > > But.. when i input this: > 7458784146511699504104824251512520704 = my resultant code is > 059C8273__06B2C5BFC__0F549DDB__0E000000 > > that is different from the site. the site it results: > > 7458784146511699504104824251512520704 = > 059C8273__06B2C5C00__00000000__00000000 > > So.. or mine is more precise, or his is correct. Increment your input number by one and try again. The Hex value then also should be on higher.
From: Guga on 28 Mar 2007 04:05
On Mar 27, 11:46 pm, /\\\\o//\\annabee <Wanna...(a)thewannabee.org> wrote: > På Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:44:35 +0200, skrev /\\o//\annabee > <Wanna...(a)thewannabee.org>: > > > På Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:12:09 +0200, skrev Guga <Guga...(a)gmail.com>: > > >> Ok, guys > > >> i think i finally got it working.. It seems that the function can > >> works without any size multiple of 32 bits. So it seems to be working > >> on 32bits, 64 bits, 96 bits, 128 bits and so on. (well.. not sure > >> yet.. if it is really working.. i have no way how to check some test > >> number) > > > Use Calc. It can do those numbers. > > woops. No it seems it cant. Sorry. I assumed... Calc is only limited to 64 Bit convertion. Tomorrow i´ll check to see if the result is ok. I can't try a binary convertion now to check back to see if it correct, because i´m awfully tired. It´s 5:00 AM here :):):) So... tomorrow i´ll se the results. Best Regards, Guga |