From: Michel Posseth [MCP] on 16 Apr 2010 01:08
And on top of the page of the first link it appears :-),,,,
But here we see contradictions
As Ingo deszcribes that the only diffference is the service contracts ,
everything is now more explicit as it was , however the underlying machinery
is just the same
until sofar i didn`t see so much difference myself in the two , but i guess
i should bether update my CV now and state that i use the WCF buzz ;-) .
"Armin Zingler" <az.nospam(a)freenet.de> schreef in bericht
> Am 15.04.2010 19:05, schrieb Michel Posseth [MCP]:
>> Hmmm,,, ;-|
>>> "A legacy technology:" ".NET Remoting":
>> Remoting = WCF or bether Remoting is one of the technologies used in WCF
>> Just that Ms decided to package webservices and Remoting for marketing
>> purposes and call it WCF doesn`t make it "legacy"
>> ( Legacy is VB6 :-) ) ,, selling old wine in new packages is how we
>> Dutch people call that
> "A legacy technology" was a quote from the linked page:
> "This topic is specific to a legacy technology that is retained for
> compatibility with existing applications and is not recommended for new
> Distributed applications should now be developed using the Windows
> Foundation (WCF)."
From: Armin Zingler on 16 Apr 2010 06:06
Am 16.04.2010 07:08, schrieb Michel Posseth [MCP]:
> And on top of the page of the first link it appears :-),,,,
Ummm....yep, I know, that's where it's from. I read it.
Anyways, we all know it know. ;)