faster than our wittiest troll
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Dudley Hanks on 26 May 2010 01:11 "George Kerby" <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:C821DB2F.4613C%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com... > > > > On 5/25/10 7:33 PM, in article 0rqov5hrg8e1ep749dks258gvoqc91bn6i(a)4ax.com, > "Jeff Jones" <jj197109671(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 25 May 2010 22:10:17 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" >> <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >> >>> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/Tortoise.jpg >>> >>> Take Care, >>> Dudley >>> >> >> Well, at least you got it pointed in the general direction of something >> again. Was it trying to bite your fingers while you felt around for where >> it was? >> > At least Dudley doesn't use his johnson, as you would, for positioning. > > You do know that they don't let go until it thunders? > > Well, you weren't using it for anything anyway... > So, that's why he hasn't the balls to post any pics ... :) Take Care, Dudley
From: Jeff Jones on 26 May 2010 02:10 On Wed, 26 May 2010 05:11:53 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >"George Kerby" <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:C821DB2F.4613C%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com... >> >> >> >> On 5/25/10 7:33 PM, in article 0rqov5hrg8e1ep749dks258gvoqc91bn6i(a)4ax.com, >> "Jeff Jones" <jj197109671(a)mailinator.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 22:10:17 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" >>> <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/LatestPics/Tortoise.jpg >>>> >>>> Take Care, >>>> Dudley >>>> >>> >>> Well, at least you got it pointed in the general direction of something >>> again. Was it trying to bite your fingers while you felt around for where >>> it was? >>> >> At least Dudley doesn't use his johnson, as you would, for positioning. >> >> You do know that they don't let go until it thunders? >> >> Well, you weren't using it for anything anyway... >> > >So, that's why he hasn't the balls to post any pics ... :) > >Take Care, >Dudley > Too funny. I have posted example shots to prove points, many times. Oh that's right, YOU COULDN'T SEE THEM. You'd have just as much ability to judge the successful photography techniques of others as you do your own. Meaning: NONE. C'mon, fess-up. You're some Master-Troll that found a new schtick, right? Pretending to be a "blind photographer" (even that phrase is completely oxymoronic) just to see how many would bite on your sighted-person's abysmal snapshots? Nothing else worked in the past to get anyone to look at your crapshots, did it. So now you've come up with this manipulative charade instead.
From: Bruce on 26 May 2010 08:22 On Wed, 26 May 2010 06:07:36 -0500, Jeff Jones <jj197109671(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > >Your photography royally sucks, you're far worse than even that mmyvusenet >cretin. You take random crapshots with automatic cameras. Your dog with a >bark-activated shutter could do better. Woof! or for video... Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!Woof!
From: Ofnuts on 26 May 2010 10:37 On 26/05/2010 16:21, George Kerby wrote: > SURE you did, turd. Sure. In your warped world. And you wrote with > Shakespeare. You toured the moon with Neil Armstrong. And, somewhere, > sometime, you sat on the right hand of God... Wrong. God sat on His Right.... -- Bertrand
From: George Kerby on 26 May 2010 11:19
On 5/26/10 9:37 AM, in article 4bfd323f$0$29926$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr, "Ofnuts" <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> wrote: > On 26/05/2010 16:21, George Kerby wrote: > >> SURE you did, turd. Sure. In your warped world. And you wrote with >> Shakespeare. You toured the moon with Neil Armstrong. And, somewhere, >> sometime, you sat on the right hand of God... > > Wrong. God sat on His Right.... <BFG!> |