From: Robert on
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:17:27 GMT, "William M. Klein" <wmklein(a)nospam.netcom.com> wrote:

>"Robert" <no(a)e.mail> wrote in message
>news:5so6q3l17qiq3gf69mi6bfk976dh1p0hc5(a)4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:32:04 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf(a)panix.com () wrote:
>>
><snip>
>> Web access is almost universal nowadays. But they need SOME way to lower
>> contractors'
>> social status. Denial of VPN access is a popular choice. Chicago roads were
>> terrible
>> this morning due to a snowstorm. Contractors had to drive in it while
>> employees worked
>> from home. The parking lot was more than half empty. There is no valid
>> security reason
>> when SecureID is used. VPN ports don't cost anything in royalties.
>>
>Robert,
> As someone who lives in suburban Chicago, I am aware of what roads were like
>today. I don't know a HUGE number of contractors, but the ones that I do know
>were all (as usual) able to work from home. Are you on a current contract that
>doesn't give you web access? About what percentage of those contractors that
>you know are not able to work from home (when employees are)?

I talked to someone from a sister team and learned all THEIR contractors have VPN access.
Our consensus was it all depends on the manager's attitude toward contractors. It's a Soft
thing, not company policy.

Everyone in the company has Web access. All 3 contractors on my team do not have VPN
access. One of them made a major effort to get it.

I was amazed at how rapidly roads were cleaned. They were terrible at 9am, clear at noon.
I had no delay going home for lunch.
From: Robert on
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:45:55 +1300, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood(a)removethis.enternet.co.nz>
wrote:

>
>
>"Robert" <no(a)e.mail> wrote in message
>news:p4d6q3hg7qlidtj2sc556ttnkqtcduq5ki(a)4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:31:32 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf(a)panix.com () wrote:
>>
>>>In article <1u65q3l1v0rcriqpa82bvev2p8j9hiqcdq(a)4ax.com>,
>>>Robert <no(a)e.mail> wrote:
>>
>>>>Manuals are as close as your Web browser.
>>>
>>>Mr Wagner, I saw my first DB2 installation in 1987... and I worked on
>>>sites where consultants/contractors/hired guns were not allowed web-access
>>>into the mid-1990s.
>>
>> I worked at place with such a policy in 2001. When I needed to look
>> something up in a
>> manual, I drove home to do it. Time per lookup was 30-45 minutes.
>>
>> Only gubbermint gets away with such inefficiency.
>
>Hmmm... :-)
>
>If I thought anyone on my team was beng that obtuse, they wouldn't be on it
>for very long. :-)

Obtuse: dense: slow to learn or understand; lacking intellectual acuity. Who are you
calling obtuse?
From: Pete Dashwood on


"Robert" <no(a)e.mail> wrote in message
news:5sj7q3tm90cp7t9i1e95oie89ccn65iacc(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:45:55 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
> <dashwood(a)removethis.enternet.co.nz>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Robert" <no(a)e.mail> wrote in message
>>news:p4d6q3hg7qlidtj2sc556ttnkqtcduq5ki(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:31:32 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf(a)panix.com () wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <1u65q3l1v0rcriqpa82bvev2p8j9hiqcdq(a)4ax.com>,
>>>>Robert <no(a)e.mail> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Manuals are as close as your Web browser.
>>>>
>>>>Mr Wagner, I saw my first DB2 installation in 1987... and I worked on
>>>>sites where consultants/contractors/hired guns were not allowed
>>>>web-access
>>>>into the mid-1990s.
>>>
>>> I worked at place with such a policy in 2001. When I needed to look
>>> something up in a
>>> manual, I drove home to do it. Time per lookup was 30-45 minutes.
>>>
>>> Only gubbermint gets away with such inefficiency.
>>
>>Hmmm... :-)
>>
>>If I thought anyone on my team was beng that obtuse, they wouldn't be on
>>it
>>for very long. :-)
>
> Obtuse: dense: slow to learn or understand; lacking intellectual acuity.
It has other overtones besides those. It can also mean obstructive or
deliberately indirect. NOT sharp,.pointed or acute

The Free Dictionary gives one meaning as: "Characterized by a lack of
intelligence or sensitivity: an obtuse remark" (or action...)

Meriam-Webster gives: "lacking sharpness or quickness of sensibility or
intellect" and gives "insensitive" and "stupid" as synonyms.

I think that covers it pretty well, at least in the context in which I used
it :-).

>Who are you
> calling obtuse?

Someone who thinks it is OK to drive home to consult a manual when they
could easily take it to work or ensure that the workplace obtain one...

Not a sensitive or supportive action, in my opinion, and so I wouldn't
tolerate it. (If they charged the drive time against my project, I would not
approve the time sheet, either...)

Pete.
--
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."


From: Anonymous on
In article <5so6q3l17qiq3gf69mi6bfk976dh1p0hc5(a)4ax.com>,
Robert <no(a)e.mail> wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:32:04 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf(a)panix.com () wrote:
>
>>In article <p4d6q3hg7qlidtj2sc556ttnkqtcduq5ki(a)4ax.com>,
>>Robert <no(a)e.mail> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:31:32 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf(a)panix.com () wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <1u65q3l1v0rcriqpa82bvev2p8j9hiqcdq(a)4ax.com>,
>>>>Robert <no(a)e.mail> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Manuals are as close as your Web browser.
>>>>
>>>>Mr Wagner, I saw my first DB2 installation in 1987... and I worked on
>>>>sites where consultants/contractors/hired guns were not allowed web-access
>>>>into the mid-1990s.
>>>
>>>I worked at place with such a policy in 2001.
>>
>>So, Mr Wagner... since you worked as such a place at some point is it
>>reasonable to conclude that you are working at such a place now?
>
>Web access is almost universal nowadays.

But for at least one place where you worked... it was not. That fact
might, I believe, allow you to say that 'at a place where I worked
consultants/contractors/hired guns did not have on-the-job web access.'

What caused you to have such difficulty understanding this construction
for another aspect of technology... I have no idea.

DD
From: Anonymous on
In article <qEOoj.26935$m_6.14703(a)fe01.news.easynews.com>,
William M. Klein <wmklein(a)nospam.netcom.com> wrote:

[snip]

>About what percentage of those contractors that
>you know are not able to work from home (when employees are)?

I cannot speak for Mr Wagner's experience but I have a few decades' worth
of experience as a consultant/contractor/hired gun... and my present
client is the first one that has permitted me to log on remotely.

I was not given the ability to do so for my first three years on site and
even now I looked at... askance if I use it as a substitute for driving
down to the office.

DD