From: Laurenz Albe on
sybrandb(a)hccnet.nl wrote:
> Sucker.

*plonk*

Laurenz Albe
From: Ben on
On Aug 29, 4:53 am, sybra...(a)hccnet.nl wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:54:57 -0700, Ben <bal...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> >After reading this it sounds like Oracle is saying that conversion is
> >a bad thing and that the database character set should be set the same
> >as the client.
>
> That is EXACTLY what Oracle is NOT (I REPEAT: NOT) saying.
>
> Oracle SAYS:
> THE DATABASE CHARACTERSET SHOULD BE THE SAME AS THE CHARACTERSET OF
> THE O/S.
>
> WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT?
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker
> Senior Oracle DBA



All caps.?.?. Yeah, that's it. It is definitely harder to understand
something typed in all caps.



From: Shakespeare on

"Ben" <balvey(a)comcast.net> schreef in bericht
news:1188393646.062818.12200(a)k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

> All caps.?.?. Yeah, that's it. It is definitely harder to understand
> something typed in all caps.
>

It WOULD save some space in character sets though if everything was in
UPPERCASE...........

Shakespeare
(What's in a case?)


From: joel garry on
On Aug 29, 2:36 am, sybra...(a)hccnet.nl wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2007 09:26:09 GMT, Laurenz Albe <inv...(a)spam.to.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >You are not only rude, but also clueless.
>
> Sucker.
>
> How often do you post anything useful?

Ah jeez, Sybrand, Laurenz is one of the good guys. You seemed to have
missed the "sounds like" qualifier in a couple of posts. Also, you
may have misinterpreted what he meant by garbage in the db when there
is no character conversion, or perhaps he should have said "potential
garbage," as the characters wouldn't be changed until later. We can
all agree that automatic conversion when it isn't wanted is a problem,
can't we?

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%E2%80%9CPlaying+Russian+Roulette+with+Silver+Bullets%E2%80%9D&btnG=Google+Search

From: sybrandb on
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:05:46 +0200, "Martin T." <0xCDCDCDCD(a)gmx.at>
wrote:

>Laurenz Albe wrote:
>> sybrandb(a)hccnet.nl wrote:
>>>> (...)
>>
>> You got me wrong.
>>
>> Of course it is not Oracle's bug if I set my NLS_LANG wrong.
>>
>> But it is Oracle's bug (in my opinion) if I have set the client
>> character set to US7ASCII, insert a byte > 127 in a text field, and
>> neither get an error nor (as Oracle seems to prefer) have the byte
>> clandestinely converted to a question mark.
>>
>> I claim that the missing check for incorrect characters is a bug.
>>
>
>Amen. But still Oracle will probably tell you that it's a Feature, not a
>Bug.

It is not a bug. Laurenz Albe is, as usual, having everything wrong,
clueless as he is on characterset issues.
In this situation you will never notice anything when your database
characterset is US7ASCII and your client characterset is US7ASCII.
If the client O/S displays the character correctly everything will
work.
I am speaking from experience, been there, done that. Laurenz Albe
just doesn't know what he is talking about (refer to his recent advise
to set the database characterset to the characterset of the client,
which is utterly stupid).

--
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA