From: Terry Farrell on
It was sorted out late last night (European time). Access via the previous
bridge ceased working when they started the upgrades.

Terry Farrell

"Graham Mayor" <gmayor(a)REMOVETHISmvps.org> wrote in message
news:OBwcFzk#KHA.3880(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> I have now checked and the bridge problems of yesterday seem to have been
> fixed.
>
> --
> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Graham Mayor - Word MVP
>
> My web site www.gmayor.com
> Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>
>
> "Graham Mayor" <gmayor(a)REMOVETHISmvps.org> wrote in message
> news:%230MrdBk%23KHA.5808(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> My comments were addressed more towards the fact that the new bridge was
>> released to the public yesterday and it simply didn't work. It crashed
>> every time with a variety of error messages. There were howls of
>> complaint in the MVP private newsgroups yesterday from other MVPs around
>> the world who were having the same problems. This morning I haven't
>> checked the bridge yet, but at least it appears to have downloaded the
>> message headers without error, so the signs are a little more hopeful.
>>
>> As for the port, some ISPs and some companies block port 119 to prevent
>> newsgroup access. Having a configurable port should get around that - but
>> for others port 119 should still work if the application is re-directed
>> there - even if other news-servers are using port 119. Most users can
>> leave the new bridge set with the default port of 120.
>>
>> My understanding - though again I haven't checked as nothing was working
>> properly yesterday - is that the Answers forum access has been removed
>> from the old bridge. I don't know what the thinking behind that was as if
>> you are not registered with the other services - MSDN etc - , the old
>> bridge should not be able to post in them.
>>
>> --
>> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>> Graham Mayor - Word MVP
>>
>> My web site www.gmayor.com
>> Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
>> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>>
>>
>> "Yves Dhondt" <yves.dhondt(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:emF4sve%23KHA.5164(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> The problems with the 'new bridge' will be exactly the same as with the
>>> old one. The only changes are that the port is now configurable and that
>>> it connects to the same service on a different server. Basically they
>>> split the load and that's it. I guess the upside is that there are now
>>> less other forums/threads where your post might end up if it goes wrong
>>> again.
>>>
>>> For the people who can't run the original NNTP bridge because they have
>>> already running something on port 119, this implementation could be a
>>> workaround. All they would have to do is copy the files from the new
>>> bridge to another directory, and edit NntpBridge.exe.config. If they
>>> change the ForumsWebServiceUrl to the old one, and set the
>>> NntpServerPort to something they like, they are good to go.
>>>
>>> Yves
>>>
>>> "Graham Mayor" <gmayor(a)REMOVETHISmvps.org> wrote in message
>>> news:O8ckuvX%23KHA.5848(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> OK the link to the new bridge is now working - which is more than can
>>>> be said for the bridge. Let's hope it is sorted out over the weekend :(
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>>>> Graham Mayor - Word MVP
>>>>
>>>> My web site www.gmayor.com
>>>> Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
>>>> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Graham Mayor" <gmayor(a)REMOVETHISmvps.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:uahS1DX%23KHA.3280(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Almost certainly the newsgroups will live on. What is changing is the
>>>>> link to Microsoft's help forums, which (like many other similar web
>>>>> forums) have been interfaced with the MS News server so what appears
>>>>> in one medium should also appear in another. In future that link will
>>>>> be broken and the help forums will change. NNTP access will then only
>>>>> be available to the new Microsoft Answers forum via the NNTP Bridge. A
>>>>> new bridge for that purpose was supposed to be available yesterday,
>>>>> but so far I see no sign of it at
>>>>> http://connect.microsoft.com/MicrosoftForums/
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the way newsgroups are peered in Usenet, they will have a
>>>>> life of their own even if/when Microsoft turns off their server. You
>>>>> will of course need to find another text newsgroup server if you wish
>>>>> to continue using them. There are plenty out there to choose from.
>>>>> Your ISP may provide a news feed and that would be the first place to
>>>>> look. After that you need to look for free text based news servers.
>>>>> They should also continue to be available via Google Groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> Inevitably as Microsoft steers its users elsewhere for their help,
>>>>> traffic levels on the newsgroups will fall, and moderation may go out
>>>>> of the window as Microsoft will not be spam filtering :(
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>>>>> Graham Mayor - Word MVP
>>>>>
>>>>> My web site www.gmayor.com
>>>>> Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
>>>>> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Robert Macy" <macy(a)california.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:2e8530cd-0e0b-48d7-9224-887f8bccb8a7(a)t26g2000prt.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> How many, which ones, of microsoftusenet groups will disappear?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will this one, too?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Linked files
Next: Table gridlines