From: Steve Wolfe on
> I need kind of a programmable router running on Linux or FreeBSD
> based on an x-86 arch-type box that should comsume the minimal amount
> of power (like a basic router) ...

For quite some time, my home router was an old DEC machine - a dual
Pentium 133 with 96 megs, and no hard drive. It ran Coyote Linux which I
modified to use an SMP kernel just for kicks. While saturating a 6-megabit
line with multiple bittorrents, I measured the electrical draw from the wall
at 45 watts.

I have a couple of Via C3-based machines now which don't do any better,
and one draws MORE power from the wall. Between having a hard drive,
CD-ROM, and seemingly much lower-efficiency power supplies, the actual power
draw is often 65 watts. A P3-650 with three hard drives in use as a file
server only drew barely more than that.

As another comparison, I have some Athlon64 3800+ machines which, when
under easy usage (say, surfing), only draw about 60 watts from the wall. In
fact, in planning for UPS capacity, I found that those machines WITH a 19"
LCD would only draw more than 100 watts together a few times during the
"usage cycle" - startup, network login, normal usage, shutdown.

In any event, ANY of those machines will have much more than enough power
for routing - the dual Pentium 133 very rarely exceeded a load of .02, and
CPU time spent in system usage was rarely more than 1% or 2%.

As others have said, to get power levels much lower than those, you'll
have to go to non-x86 hardware. One of the routers on which you can put
Linux (and hence, customize to a great extent) will probably use 1/4 of that
power.


From: CptDondo on
Steve Wolfe wrote:
>
> As others have said, to get power levels much lower than those, you'll
> have to go to non-x86 hardware. One of the routers on which you can put
> Linux (and hence, customize to a great extent) will probably use 1/4 of that
> power.
>

I put a meter on my WRTSL54G (or whatever alphabet soup Linksys came up
with) and it metered at a whopping 70 ma booting and about 140 ma when
the radio came on.

I could be wrong on those numbers by a few ma, but work out the math:

140 ma @ 5v = .7W

Whee! a 200 MHz MIPS chip is a nice thing.

--Yan
From: Måns Rullgård on
CptDondo <yan(a)NsOeSiPnAeMr.com> writes:

> Steve Wolfe wrote:
>> As others have said, to get power levels much lower than those,
>> you'll have to go to non-x86 hardware. One of the routers on which
>> you can put Linux (and hence, customize to a great extent) will
>> probably use 1/4 of that power.
>
> I put a meter on my WRTSL54G (or whatever alphabet soup Linksys came
> up with) and it metered at a whopping 70 ma booting and about 140 ma
> when the radio came on.
>
> I could be wrong on those numbers by a few ma, but work out the math:
>
> 140 ma @ 5v = .7W
>
> Whee! a 200 MHz MIPS chip is a nice thing.

Most (all?) of the Linksys routers have ARM chips. Still nice, of
course.

--
M�ns Rullg�rd
mans(a)mansr.com
From: CptDondo on
M�ns Rullg�rd wrote:
> CptDondo <yan(a)NsOeSiPnAeMr.com> writes:
>
>> Whee! a 200 MHz MIPS chip is a nice thing.
>
> Most (all?) of the Linksys routers have ARM chips. Still nice, of
> course.
>

Are you sure about that? OpenWrt only has experimental arm support but
very stable MIPS support. Most of the chips are MIPS.

http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware

--Yan
From: Måns Rullgård on
CptDondo <yan(a)NsOeSiPnAeMr.com> writes:

> M�ns Rullg�rd wrote:
>> CptDondo <yan(a)NsOeSiPnAeMr.com> writes:
>>
>>> Whee! a 200 MHz MIPS chip is a nice thing.
>> Most (all?) of the Linksys routers have ARM chips. Still nice, of
>> course.
>>
>
> Are you sure about that? OpenWrt only has experimental arm support
> but very stable MIPS support. Most of the chips are MIPS.
>
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware

You're quite right. I was looking at that list some time ago, and
most of the models on sale here (UK) seemed to be the ARM varieties.

--
M�ns Rullg�rd
mans(a)mansr.com
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: M$ Bluetooth Transceiver
Next: CPU Freq scaling