3000 recipients
in [Postfix]
|
From: Gaby Vanhegan on 4 Jan 2010 09:01 On 4 Jan 2010, at 13:43, Kenneth Marshall wrote: > I will chime in with a recommendation for mailman. It is easy to > setup and run. I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web interface like mailman and works great with Postfix. Gaby. -- Expounding the theory of infinite Abelian Badgers http://playr.co.uk/
From: Jerry on 4 Jan 2010 09:53 On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:01:00 +0000 Gaby Vanhegan <gaby(a)vanhegan.net> replied: >I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web >interface like mailman and works great with Postfix. Personally, I have used DADA Mail in the past. It is written in Perl and has a web interface for most common configuration settings. Obviously, it can be configured manually. In fact, some settings are not exposed in the web interface. Plus, it works fine with Postfix. <http://dadamailproject.com/> -- Jerry postfix.user(a)yahoo.com TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html Yeah, but you're taking the universe out of context.
From: Gaby Vanhegan on 4 Jan 2010 09:58 On 4 Jan 2010, at 14:53, Jerry wrote: > Personally, I have used DADA Mail in the past. It is written in Perl > and has a web interface for most common configuration settings. > Obviously, it can be configured manually. In fact, some settings are > not exposed in the web interface. Plus, it works fine with Postfix. > > <http://dadamailproject.com/> I have a preference for MLMs that manage themselves. Having a web interface means that you usually need use some complicated trickery to put a working copy of perl/python/whatever inside the web chroot, I'm a big fan of keeping the two services apart. MLMs that are email/self managed are slightly less user friendly but more secure for my purposes. -- Uganda Maximum - Enemy of the English Thrust http://www.playr.co.uk/
From: richard lucassen on 4 Jan 2010 14:23 On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:01:00 +0000 Gaby Vanhegan <gaby(a)vanhegan.net> wrote: > > I will chime in with a recommendation for mailman. It is easy to > > setup and run. > > > I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web > interface like mailman and works great with Postfix. Thnx to everyone. I think mailman and mlmmj are good suggestions. I'll examine all of these and I'll choose the one that fits best to this rather particular purpose. R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak aloud and remove all doubt. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht | | Public key and email address: | | http://www.lucassen.org/mail-pubkey.html | +------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: Gaby Vanhegan on 4 Jan 2010 16:10
On 4 Jan 2010, at 19:23, richard lucassen wrote: > Thnx to everyone. I think mailman and mlmmj are good suggestions. I'll > examine all of these and I'll choose the one that fits best to this > rather particular purpose. Mailman is a python app, mlmmj is a native C app that works through a local postfix alias. If you're interested, I have a nice script that sets up mlmmj instances very easily. G. -- Junkets for bunterish lickspittles since 1998! http://www.playr.co.uk/ |