From: Arny Krueger on 30 Nov 2009 07:33 "geoff" <geoff(a)nospam-paf.co.nz> wrote in message news:XNGdnWUIH55vgI7WnZ2dnVY3goudnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > Phil Allison wrote: >> "geoff" <geoff(a)nospam-paf.co.nz> >> >>> >>> Yes, the 'headroom' ascertion seems a bit odd to me too. >>> >>> It would be nice to know exactly how this apparent failing actually >>> manifests. >> >> >> ** The XTA DP226 displays a parameter called "Headroom". >> Obviously allows one to tell immediately if a new input IC is up to >> scratch or not ..... Not so much. > Not from what I read. - it's not some sort of internal self-test of > levels at all. > From the descriptions of the various instances of 'headroom' in the > manual, they are simply level indications/warnings wrt max unclipped > output level. > But I only had time to skim the manual and as usual you are doubtlessly > right. I found two mentions. They lead me to believe that they relate to unclipped input level, which varies depending on how the built-in limiting is set. No way do they indicate subtle aspects of op amp performance.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Quick question from an old has-been Next: Pianos WAS: Mic recommendation for soloact |