Prev: T-Mobile Dongle for Ubuntu
Next: Crashing 16-bit program
From: Tony van der Hoff on 26 May 2010 11:59
On 26/05/10 12:44, Justin C wrote:
> On 2010-05-25, Tony van der Hoff<tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>> On 25/05/10 15:32, Paul Martin wrote:
>>> In article<htekif$37s$1(a)localhost.localdomain>,
>>> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>>>>> Is it? Seems unlikely, but the ticket man at Tottenham Hale seemed to
>>>>>> think so. He sold me a ticket which requires it to be the case, at least.
>>>
>>>> Mornington Crescent!
>>>
>>> But you're in reverse gnip. Traceroute should help diagnosis.
>>>
>> Not if you allow straddling
>
> But I thought that the Exeter Pinch was still in force, causing the
> straddle to be an exclusive double, if that's the case I don't see how a
> straddle would help.
>
Didn't the 2009 revision to the rules outlaw the Exeter Pinch in the
Central zone?
From: Justin C on 27 May 2010 10:25
On 2010-05-26, Tony van der Hoff <tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:
> On 26/05/10 12:44, Justin C wrote:
>> On 2010-05-25, Tony van der Hoff<tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>>> On 25/05/10 15:32, Paul Martin wrote:
>>>> In article<htekif$37s$1(a)localhost.localdomain>,
>>>> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>>>>>> Is it? Seems unlikely, but the ticket man at Tottenham Hale seemed to
>>>>>>> think so. He sold me a ticket which requires it to be the case, at least.
>>>>
>>>>> Mornington Crescent!
>>>>
>>>> But you're in reverse gnip. Traceroute should help diagnosis.
>>>>
>>> Not if you allow straddling
>>
>> But I thought that the Exeter Pinch was still in force, causing the
>> straddle to be an exclusive double, if that's the case I don't see how a
>> straddle would help.
>>
> Didn't the 2009 revision to the rules outlaw the Exeter Pinch in the
> Central zone?

I think I need a more up-to-date set of rules, mine have 1946 printed on
the cover.

Justin.

--
Justin C, by the sea.
From: Davey on 27 May 2010 11:12
On Mon, 24 May 2010 20:37:53 +0100
Tony van der Hoff <tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:

> On 23/05/10 16:55, Tom Anderson wrote:
> > Needless to say, wrong group!
> >
> > Apologies,
> > tom
> >
> > On Sun, 23 May 2010, Tom Anderson wrote:
> >
> >> Well,
> >>
> >> Is it? Seems unlikely, but the ticket man at Tottenham Hale seemed
> >> to think so. He sold me a ticket which requires it to be the case,
> >> at least.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> tom
> >>
> >>
> >
> Mornington Crescent!
>

I didn't know this about 'I'm sorry I haven't a Clue':

"Although five episodes transmitted in 1974–1975 are still lost...".

Anybody got some old tapes stashed away?

--
Davey.

From: Tony van der Hoff on 27 May 2010 11:19
On 27/05/10 15:25, Justin C wrote:
> On 2010-05-26, Tony van der Hoff<tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>> On 26/05/10 12:44, Justin C wrote:
>>> On 2010-05-25, Tony van der Hoff<tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>>>> On 25/05/10 15:32, Paul Martin wrote:
>>>>> In article<htekif$37s$1(a)localhost.localdomain>,
>>>>> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>>>>>>> Is it? Seems unlikely, but the ticket man at Tottenham Hale seemed to
>>>>>>>> think so. He sold me a ticket which requires it to be the case, at least.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mornington Crescent!
>>>>>
>>>>> But you're in reverse gnip. Traceroute should help diagnosis.
>>>>>
>>>> Not if you allow straddling
>>>
>>> But I thought that the Exeter Pinch was still in force, causing the
>>> straddle to be an exclusive double, if that's the case I don't see how a
>>> straddle would help.
>>>
>> Didn't the 2009 revision to the rules outlaw the Exeter Pinch in the
>> Central zone?
>
> I think I need a more up-to-date set of rules, mine have 1946 printed on
> the cover.

Yes, but they're a bit pricy, as you'd expect for a four-volume set,
plus appendices. Shame theyr'e not published on line.

--
Tony van der Hoff | mailto:tony(a)vanderhoff.org
Ari�ge, France |
From: Gordon Henderson on 27 May 2010 12:00
In article <htm2h5$drf$1(a)localhost.localdomain>,
Tony van der Hoff <tony(a)vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>On 27/05/10 15:25, Justin C wrote:
>> On 2010-05-26, Tony van der Hoff<tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>>> On 26/05/10 12:44, Justin C wrote:
>>>> On 2010-05-25, Tony van der Hoff<tony(a)nospam.vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 25/05/10 15:32, Paul Martin wrote:
>>>>>> In article<htekif$37s$1(a)localhost.localdomain>,
>>>>>> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Is it? Seems unlikely, but the ticket man at Tottenham Hale seemed to
>>>>>>>>> think so. He sold me a ticket which requires it to be the case,
>at least.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mornington Crescent!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you're in reverse gnip. Traceroute should help diagnosis.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not if you allow straddling
>>>>
>>>> But I thought that the Exeter Pinch was still in force, causing the
>>>> straddle to be an exclusive double, if that's the case I don't see how a
>>>> straddle would help.
>>>>
>>> Didn't the 2009 revision to the rules outlaw the Exeter Pinch in the
>>> Central zone?
>>
>> I think I need a more up-to-date set of rules, mine have 1946 printed on
>> the cover.
>
>Yes, but they're a bit pricy, as you'd expect for a four-volume set,
>plus appendices. Shame theyr'e not published on line.

The four volume set? Or to give it it's correct name; The Concise Edition
in a mere Four Volumes. Now the Twenty Three volume set... There's a
sight to behold!

Gordon
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: T-Mobile Dongle for Ubuntu
Next: Crashing 16-bit program