Genuine question for atheists
in [Using XP]
|
From: Kadaitcha Man on 2 Nov 2009 06:37 Uncle Vic, ye seven-chinned idle immaterial skein of sleeve silk, thou art deformed, crooked, old and sere, ill-faced, worse bodied, shapeless everywhere, vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind, stigmatical in making, worse in mind, ye fudged together: > One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> wrote: > >> What's it like to be a fuckwit? >> > > I don't know, have you stopped beating your wife? What wife? > You don't actually believe in that jebus nonsense, do you? I thought > you were smarter than that. How smart do you suppose it is to argue that someone is less intelligent than yourself by your implicating a conclusion that is not logically connected to your premise, dimbulb? -- Ubuntu 9.10 x64 running Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox 16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 10 * SATA2 3GB/s HDDs as dual 3TB RAID5 8-thread Intel Extreme i7-975 @ 3.80GHz, air-cooled Thermaltake Intel BoneTrail Motherboard Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 1GB Honda Sabre 1100cc V-Twin I can wank better than you can. PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
From: chrisv on 2 Nov 2009 08:20 Uncle Vic wrote: >One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> wrote: *plonk*
From: chrisv on 2 Nov 2009 08:20 Steve O wrote: >Kadaitcha Man wrote: *plonk*
From: Lookout on 2 Nov 2009 09:38 On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:37:07 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> wrote: >Uncle Vic, ye seven-chinned idle immaterial skein of sleeve silk, thou >art deformed, crooked, old and sere, ill-faced, worse bodied, shapeless >everywhere, vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind, stigmatical in >making, worse in mind, ye fudged together: > >> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> wrote: >> >>> What's it like to be a fuckwit? >>> >> >> I don't know, have you stopped beating your wife? > >What wife? Of course no woman would be with you. That surprises no one. > >> You don't actually believe in that jebus nonsense, do you? I thought >> you were smarter than that. > >How smart do you suppose it is to argue that someone is less intelligent >than yourself by your implicating a conclusion that is not logically >connected to your premise, dimbulb? Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
From: Pavlov on 2 Nov 2009 09:48
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:20:59 -0600, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: >Steve O wrote: > >>Kadaitcha Man wrote: > >*plonk* Plonk for chisy |