Hi Larry, Hi Jeff,
in [Visual Basic]
|
From: Michel Posseth [MCP] on 22 Mar 2010 17:19 Well not so verry long ago you atacked me to although i am a certified VB6 developer and code Basic since the mid eighties ( CBM64 ) and do not care if it is VB legacy or .Net syntax do you see me atacking persons who might use non Visual syntax ? what i try to say is that sometimes some of you over react in defending there beloved VB legacy regards Michel "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> schreef in bericht news:e6hul6SyKHA.5576(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstname(a)planet.nl> wrote in message > news:edN3CSSyKHA.4752(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > >> This was a good newsgroup and I recommend >> it often in the forums. > > It still is a good newsgroup, and it would be even better if people such > as yourself stopped posting their dotnet evangelism messages here. > >> I did my best to create a VB6 sample that contained >> the Split and the Replace because that was obvious >> an answer for a problem. > > But answers containing Split and Replace had ALREADY been posted, long > before you posted your own message, and the code they contained was > written in VB6 and would actually compile in VB6, whereas the code in your > message was NOT written in VB6 and would NOT compile in it. We all know > why you really posted your message, Cor, and that is for the dotnet > evangelism that it contained, which of course was the real purpose of your > post. > > You are clearly a troll. > > Mike > > >
From: Henning on 22 Mar 2010 18:37 Regarding Cor, as a MVP, he should be well aware of the differnces in syntax. He has been doing it before, so I see no excuse for posting dotnet syntax in a reply to a VB6 Q. I don't recall the attacs on you, but must have been a similar issue. Not one posting VB Classic replies to VB Classic questions will be attacked, for sure. /Henning "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <msdn(a)posseth.com> skrev i meddelandet news:4D289CEB-14C5-4D15-B231-8ED3E68EFB53(a)microsoft.com... > > Well not so verry long ago you atacked me to although i am a certified VB6 > developer and code Basic since the mid eighties ( CBM64 ) > and do not care if it is VB legacy or .Net syntax do you see me atacking > persons who might use non Visual syntax ? > > what i try to say is that sometimes some of you over react in defending > there beloved VB legacy > > regards > > Michel > > > > > "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> schreef in bericht > news:e6hul6SyKHA.5576(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstname(a)planet.nl> wrote in message >> news:edN3CSSyKHA.4752(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> >>> This was a good newsgroup and I recommend >>> it often in the forums. >> >> It still is a good newsgroup, and it would be even better if people such >> as yourself stopped posting their dotnet evangelism messages here. >> >>> I did my best to create a VB6 sample that contained >>> the Split and the Replace because that was obvious >>> an answer for a problem. >> >> But answers containing Split and Replace had ALREADY been posted, long >> before you posted your own message, and the code they contained was >> written in VB6 and would actually compile in VB6, whereas the code in >> your message was NOT written in VB6 and would NOT compile in it. We all >> know why you really posted your message, Cor, and that is for the dotnet >> evangelism that it contained, which of course was the real purpose of >> your post. >> >> You are clearly a troll. >> >> Mike >> >> >> >
From: AR88 Enthusiast on 23 Mar 2010 00:26 "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <msdn(a)posseth.com> wrote in message news:4D289CEB-14C5-4D15-B231-8ED3E68EFB53(a)microsoft.com... > and code Basic since the mid eighties ( CBM64 ) Sniff! Bl88dy newbie!
From: Cor Ligthert[MVP] on 23 Mar 2010 04:36 Henning, You show that you are not aware how more complex .Nxt is then only VB6. My post was only a reaction on the consequent messages here that VB6 is so different from VB10. (I made two mistakes in it, but nitpickers make of course a complete mountain from it. If I see how long answering threads are in this newsgroups, then I am surely not the only one in that, or you should tell that you can do that and an MVP not, because an MVP has to be much better then you in VB6, I can assure you I most probably am not) I've seen here in this newsgroup that there are much and really very much more differences between VB1 and VB6 then between VB6 and VB10, which are equal steps. (There has been also VB7.1 as a complete version which has language additions. I save you the examples because that makes no sense in this newsgroup) And start picking the nits from it. I am awaiting for those. And as always, pay no attention to the more reality in this message. Cor "Henning" <computer_hero(a)coldmail.com> wrote in message news:eQtrSBhyKHA.2644(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Regarding Cor, as a MVP, he should be well aware of the differnces in > syntax. He has been doing it before, so I see no excuse for posting dotnet > syntax in a reply to a VB6 Q. > > I don't recall the attacs on you, but must have been a similar issue. Not > one posting VB Classic replies to VB Classic questions will be attacked, > for sure. > > /Henning > > "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <msdn(a)posseth.com> skrev i meddelandet > news:4D289CEB-14C5-4D15-B231-8ED3E68EFB53(a)microsoft.com... >> >> Well not so verry long ago you atacked me to although i am a certified >> VB6 developer and code Basic since the mid eighties ( CBM64 ) >> and do not care if it is VB legacy or .Net syntax do you see me atacking >> persons who might use non Visual syntax ? >> >> what i try to say is that sometimes some of you over react in defending >> there beloved VB legacy >> >> regards >> >> Michel >> >> >> >> >> "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> schreef in bericht >> news:e6hul6SyKHA.5576(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstname(a)planet.nl> wrote in message >>> news:edN3CSSyKHA.4752(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> >>>> This was a good newsgroup and I recommend >>>> it often in the forums. >>> >>> It still is a good newsgroup, and it would be even better if people such >>> as yourself stopped posting their dotnet evangelism messages here. >>> >>>> I did my best to create a VB6 sample that contained >>>> the Split and the Replace because that was obvious >>>> an answer for a problem. >>> >>> But answers containing Split and Replace had ALREADY been posted, long >>> before you posted your own message, and the code they contained was >>> written in VB6 and would actually compile in VB6, whereas the code in >>> your message was NOT written in VB6 and would NOT compile in it. We all >>> know why you really posted your message, Cor, and that is for the dotnet >>> evangelism that it contained, which of course was the real purpose of >>> your post. >>> >>> You are clearly a troll. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >> > >
From: Henning on 23 Mar 2010 05:58 Cor, I am very aware of the difference between VB10 and VB6, that is why your posting of VB10 code as a reply to a VB6 question is only confusing. Right, those mistakes show that already in declaring variables the difference is not compileable in VB6. I know that you know the reason why you are attacked when deliberately posting VB10 code. In my opinion it *is* worse than posting not working VB6 code as a reply to a VB3 question. Isn't it easier to not post at all, than posting code that doesn't compile in VB6? Can we stop this now and try our best to post only working code in the relevant group. /Henning "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstname(a)planet.nl> skrev i meddelandet news:ukJyAQmyKHA.5940(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Henning, > > You show that you are not aware how more complex .Nxt is then only VB6. > > My post was only a reaction on the consequent messages here that VB6 is so > different from VB10. > (I made two mistakes in it, but nitpickers make of course a complete > mountain from it. If I see how long answering threads are in this > newsgroups, then I am surely not the only one in that, or you should tell > that you can do that and an MVP not, because an MVP has to be much better > then you in VB6, I can assure you I most probably am not) > > I've seen here in this newsgroup that there are much and really very much > more differences between VB1 and VB6 then between VB6 and VB10, which are > equal steps. (There has been also VB7.1 as a complete version which has > language additions. I save you the examples because that makes no sense in > this newsgroup) > > And start picking the nits from it. I am awaiting for those. And as > always, pay no attention to the more reality in this message. > > Cor > > "Henning" <computer_hero(a)coldmail.com> wrote in message > news:eQtrSBhyKHA.2644(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Regarding Cor, as a MVP, he should be well aware of the differnces in >> syntax. He has been doing it before, so I see no excuse for posting >> dotnet syntax in a reply to a VB6 Q. >> >> I don't recall the attacs on you, but must have been a similar issue. Not >> one posting VB Classic replies to VB Classic questions will be attacked, >> for sure. >> >> /Henning >> >> "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <msdn(a)posseth.com> skrev i meddelandet >> news:4D289CEB-14C5-4D15-B231-8ED3E68EFB53(a)microsoft.com... >>> >>> Well not so verry long ago you atacked me to although i am a certified >>> VB6 developer and code Basic since the mid eighties ( CBM64 ) >>> and do not care if it is VB legacy or .Net syntax do you see me >>> atacking persons who might use non Visual syntax ? >>> >>> what i try to say is that sometimes some of you over react in defending >>> there beloved VB legacy >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Michel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> schreef in bericht >>> news:e6hul6SyKHA.5576(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>> "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstname(a)planet.nl> wrote in message >>>> news:edN3CSSyKHA.4752(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>> >>>>> This was a good newsgroup and I recommend >>>>> it often in the forums. >>>> >>>> It still is a good newsgroup, and it would be even better if people >>>> such as yourself stopped posting their dotnet evangelism messages here. >>>> >>>>> I did my best to create a VB6 sample that contained >>>>> the Split and the Replace because that was obvious >>>>> an answer for a problem. >>>> >>>> But answers containing Split and Replace had ALREADY been posted, long >>>> before you posted your own message, and the code they contained was >>>> written in VB6 and would actually compile in VB6, whereas the code in >>>> your message was NOT written in VB6 and would NOT compile in it. We all >>>> know why you really posted your message, Cor, and that is for the >>>> dotnet evangelism that it contained, which of course was the real >>>> purpose of your post. >>>> >>>> You are clearly a troll. >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Should my properties be a method or set by a method Next: LostFocus not firing |