Internet companies could be forced to track you
in [Computers]
|
Prev: .NET
Next: Allphones scam?
From: Rod Speed on 12 Jun 2010 03:13 z1 wrote > Doug Jewell wrote >> I'm sure if govco required logging of access data, they would also >> require net-cafe's & libraries to log who used it and when. It'd >> probably come with a requirement on ISP's to block domestic VPN >> traffic & proxies too. > so what the filter don't catch, the logging will. > it will be death to bittorrenting I suppose. Bet it isnt. Its just more utterly mindless hyperventilation. They wont ever ban domestic VPN traffic either.
From: Rod Speed on 12 Jun 2010 03:15 terryc wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:20:10 +0800, Clocky wrote: > >> Rod Speed wrote: > >>> Usual terminal govt stupidity. Anyone with even half a clue that >>> wants to conceal their use of the net would just use the library >>> net service or a net cafe. >> Useless if they keep records of usage of their systems, or are made to. > And a few have/are getting surveillance cameras. Completely trivial to avoid those. Legally in NSW those have to have signs advising that surveillance is in operation.
From: terryc on 12 Jun 2010 03:53 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:15:12 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > terryc wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:20:10 +0800, Clocky wrote: >> >>> Rod Speed wrote: >> >>>> Usual terminal govt stupidity. Anyone with even half a clue that >>>> wants to conceal their use of the net would just use the library net >>>> service or a net cafe. > >>> Useless if they keep records of usage of their systems, or are made >>> to. > >> And a few have/are getting surveillance cameras. > > Completely trivial to avoid those. Trivial in the sense of? Going to the next one? > > Legally in NSW those have to have signs advising that surveillance is in > operation.
From: terryc on 12 Jun 2010 03:57 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:30:58 +0930, annily wrote: > Aren't they talking about web browsing and email? What's that got to do > with BT? that was what I understood, just the url and from/to information, no data content. Actually, if it is just the to/from, it would be useless and would have to be the whole header(could get large there). Closed list that doesn't pass on the source any one.
From: terryc on 12 Jun 2010 03:59
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:11:54 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > How could they possibly inspect all the records of every net cafe and > library in Sydney for example ? They wont. they will just inspect the one used by the person(s) of interest. > > We saw the same completely mindless claims about requiring a proper id > when buying a mobile phone etc and it turns out that anyone with even > half a clue can get one anonymously any time they like. So how do you do that? |