Is this Regular Expression for UTF-8 Correct??
in [MFC]
|
From: Peter Olcott on 27 May 2010 22:08 On 5/27/2010 12:15 PM, Pete Delgado wrote: > "Peter Olcott"<NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message > news:48SdnXZ-_ZPfvGnWnZ2dnUVZ_hEAAAAA(a)giganews.com... >> On 5/19/2010 12:09 PM, Pete Delgado wrote: >>> "Peter Olcott"<NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message >>> news:vOGdnfGVDviykWnWnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>>> On 5/19/2010 10:52 AM, Pete Delgado wrote: >>>>> "Peter Olcott"<NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:GOadnXHFWbfxbG7WnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>>> On 5/19/2010 12:34 AM, Mihai N. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can't accept this without direct proof. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet, we are all supposed to take everything *you* >>>>>>> say without any proof. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Please cite examples of what I need to prove. So far no one asked for >>>>>> any >>>>>> proof. >>>>> >>>>> You provide no proof of your numerous performance claims. When pressed, >>>>> you >>>>> do cite your own flawed reasoning, but you never provide numerical, >>>>> verifiable proof of working code - something Joe has asked you to do >>>>> many >>>>> times in the hopes that it would help you learn where your assumptions >>>>> are >>>>> flawed. >>>> >>>> I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. The >>>> code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be added to >>>> this design is the actual code the does the translation from UTF-8 to >>>> UTF-32. >>> >>> I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th! >>> >>> -Pete >>> >>> >> >> It may before then. I learned on a prior job that it is best to under >> promise and over deliver. > > Peter, > I notice that you have not delivered on your promise and have not posted > your code. The 27th was chosen because it is a day *after* the week you > stated that you needed to complete the code. > > Have you posted the code and I have simply missed it?? > > -Pete > > http://www.ocr4screen.com/UTF8.cpp Totally untested.
From: Peter Olcott on 27 May 2010 22:13 On 5/27/2010 9:08 PM, Peter Olcott wrote: > On 5/27/2010 12:15 PM, Pete Delgado wrote: >> "Peter Olcott"<NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message >> news:48SdnXZ-_ZPfvGnWnZ2dnUVZ_hEAAAAA(a)giganews.com... >>> On 5/19/2010 12:09 PM, Pete Delgado wrote: >>>> "Peter Olcott"<NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message >>>> news:vOGdnfGVDviykWnWnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>> On 5/19/2010 10:52 AM, Pete Delgado wrote: >>>>>> "Peter Olcott"<NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:GOadnXHFWbfxbG7WnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>>>> On 5/19/2010 12:34 AM, Mihai N. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can't accept this without direct proof. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet, we are all supposed to take everything *you* >>>>>>>> say without any proof. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please cite examples of what I need to prove. So far no one asked >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> any >>>>>>> proof. >>>>>> >>>>>> You provide no proof of your numerous performance claims. When >>>>>> pressed, >>>>>> you >>>>>> do cite your own flawed reasoning, but you never provide numerical, >>>>>> verifiable proof of working code - something Joe has asked you to do >>>>>> many >>>>>> times in the hopes that it would help you learn where your >>>>>> assumptions >>>>>> are >>>>>> flawed. >>>>> >>>>> I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. >>>>> The >>>>> code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be >>>>> added to >>>>> this design is the actual code the does the translation from UTF-8 to >>>>> UTF-32. >>>> >>>> I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th! >>>> >>>> -Pete >>>> >>>> >>> >>> It may before then. I learned on a prior job that it is best to under >>> promise and over deliver. >> >> Peter, >> I notice that you have not delivered on your promise and have not posted >> your code. The 27th was chosen because it is a day *after* the week you >> stated that you needed to complete the code. >> >> Have you posted the code and I have simply missed it?? >> >> -Pete >> >> > > http://www.ocr4screen.com/UTF8.cpp > Totally untested. It also needs this file: http://www.ocr4screen.com/Array2D.h
From: Pete Delgado on 27 May 2010 23:39 "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message news:-NednaTwpqZhfGPWnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... it. >> >> Again, removing the context of the wager, the claim that you will have >> written code with specific performance characteristics, won't work here. >> Anyone can view the thread to see what you have done. >> > > You don't know much about written contracts do you? Peter, If your studies with regard to contract law are on par with your programming studies, I suspect that you once browsed the legal section at the local Barnes and Noble and now consider yourself a legal expert! All you need to do now is pass the bar right??? BTW: I noticed that you posted some code and at least had the decency to cite the original source! rotfl... that hardly qualifies as *original work*, but then at this point I suppose that I should be happy that you posted anything at all! -Pete
From: Peter Olcott on 27 May 2010 23:56 On 5/27/2010 10:39 PM, Pete Delgado wrote: > "Peter Olcott"<NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message > news:-NednaTwpqZhfGPWnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > it. >>> >>> Again, removing the context of the wager, the claim that you will have >>> written code with specific performance characteristics, won't work here. >>> Anyone can view the thread to see what you have done. >>> >> >> You don't know much about written contracts do you? > > Peter, > If your studies with regard to contract law are on par with your programming > studies, I suspect that you once browsed the legal section at the local > Barnes and Noble and now consider yourself a legal expert! All you need to > do now is pass the bar right??? > > BTW: I noticed that you posted some code and at least had the decency to > cite the original source! rotfl... that hardly qualifies as *original work*, > but then at this point I suppose that I should be happy that you posted > anything at all! > > -Pete > > There are two files numb skull. I will add the copyright notice now so no other morons make this same mistake.
From: Liviu on 28 May 2010 00:40
"Pete Delgado" <Peter.Delgado(a)NoSpam.com> wrote... >>> >>> Again, removing the context of the wager, the claim that you will >>> have written code with specific performance characteristics, won't >>> work here. Anyone can view the thread to see what you have done. > > BTW: I noticed that you posted some code and at least had the decency > to cite the original source! rotfl... that hardly qualifies as > *original work*, but then at this point I suppose that I should be > happy that you posted anything at all! Heh... I believe the original part can be reduced to int main() { return 0; } since the rest would be discarded by any half-decent compiler/linker in an optimizing mood. If Peter cared to profile that at all, it would score sky high performance, for sure. Take that, you naysayers ;-) Liviu |