Prev: MORE CAGED ANIMALS: Photo of The First Day of the year
Next: FastStone Image Viewer (Forgery)
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on 4 Jan 2010 16:33
ransley <Mark_Ransley(a)Yahoo.com> wrote:

> Why crybaby, for telling the truth, just google 7dsoft focus.

39 hits, 38 times you telling people to google it and one
single report ... Canon sold only 10 or 20 7D, all in all?

-Wolfgang
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on 4 Jan 2010 16:38
Larry Thong <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote:

> I can
> put any Nikkor on my bodies and they focus perfectly every time. This is
> precious!!

Since there is no such thing as perfect focus, the logical
conclusion is that you have 0 (ZERO) bodies.

-Wolfgang
From: ransley on 5 Jan 2010 08:17
On Jan 4, 9:38 am, Allen <all...(a)austin.rr.com> wrote:
> ransley wrote:
> > On Jan 4, 12:39 am, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >> ransley  <Mark_Rans...(a)Yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> On Jan 3, 1:15 pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>>> ransley  <Mark_Rans...(a)Yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Jan 2, 4:48 pm, RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> AF issues with the 7D.  Unreal.  One guy on Dpreview is on his 4th
> >>>>>> unit, which seems to be ok.  Maybe it's time for Canon to grab their
> >>>>>> ankles and license Nikon's AF technology?
> >>>>>>http://www.google.ca/#hl=en&q=canon+7d+af+issues&meta=&aq=0&oq=canon+...
> >>>>> There are too many crybabys selling this thing to get honest responses
> >>>>> here.
> >>>> Certainly won't get any from you.
> >>>>> Darwin Wiggett has an interesting review,
> >>>> "Interesting" in that's it's highly suspect because he uses an odd
> >>>> lens that won't do autofocus and doesn't provide any RAW images.
> >>> Interesting is most if not all reviewers dont buy their test product,
> >>> it is delivered by Canon. If the major reviewers all had to purchase
> >>> the camera the complaints I can google for would be published
> >>> everywhere. Of course canon would not send perfect samples to the
> >>> reviewers and sell the public, just anything made, would they.
> >> So you're saying that reviewers are all liars who don't objectively
> >> review cameras.
>
> >> --
> >> Ray Fischer        
> >> rfisc...(a)sonic.net  - Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > You lack comprehension, re read what I posted, or get help.
>
> You might want to hone your writing skills to the point that your
> messages are clear.
> Allen- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

My 10 yrs old kid understood what I wrote, I pity you.
From: ransley on 5 Jan 2010 08:19
On Jan 4, 3:33 pm, Wolfgang Weisselberg <ozcvgt...(a)sneakemail.com>
wrote:
> ransley <Mark_Rans...(a)Yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Why crybaby, for telling the truth, just google 7dsoft focus.
>
> 39 hits, 38 times you telling people to google it and one
> single report ... Canon sold only 10 or 20 7D, all in all?
>
> -Wolfgang

I see the level of inteligence in this group is the real issue
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on 6 Jan 2010 08:02
ransley <Mark_Ransley(a)Yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 3:33 pm, Wolfgang Weisselberg <ozcvgt...(a)sneakemail.com>
>> ransley <Mark_Rans...(a)Yahoo.com> wrote:

>> 39 hits, 38 times you telling people to google it and one
>> single report ... Canon sold only 10 or 20 7D, all in all?

> I see the level of inteligence in this group is the real issue

Yes, Einstein. Just leave and the level of inteligence[sic] will
drop sharply, as the level of intelligence rises.

So, a single report over many, many, many 7Ds sold constitutes a
problem affecting all 7Ds? Come on, you can do better. You can
prove by your standards that the 5DIII will never work, because
there isn't a single report of it working yet.

Anyway, whoever paid you 10 cents for your campain was overcharged
by a couple million dollars.

-Wolfgang
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: MORE CAGED ANIMALS: Photo of The First Day of the year
Next: FastStone Image Viewer (Forgery)