First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Meaning, Presuppositions, Truth-relevance, Goedel's Theorem and
Newberry says... If (Ex)Pxm is necessarily false then according to the principles of truth-relevant logic ~(Qm & (Ex)Pxm) is ~(T v F). No, it's ~(T & F). The reason is that it is analogous to ~(Q & (P & ~P)) Please see section 2.2 of my paper. So you are saying that ~(Qm & (Ex) Pxm) ... 13 Aug 2010 09:13
MATHEMATICAL CLEAR PROOF OF -1 TANGENT =.001 TO THREE PHD PROFESSORS INCLUDING RENOWNED PROFESSOR ESCULTURA. ANY ONE DISPROVE THIS FOR HISTORICAL RECORD
Based on the " ipso facto" sentinal value of the sqare root of 2 by Hope research At square root 1(1-1=0) At 2 the value is .41( sentinal number) Hence .59 +.41= 1 exact, or (59+1) +(41-1)=1 exact ..59-.41 = 18 , half line spread for the value.(0.5-0.5=zero halfline spread) ..59/18-.41/18=0.1 *0.... 12 Aug 2010 09:17
alas, a proof of Goldbach without appeal to Algebra #5.25 Correcting Math
I wrote earlier: Sorry about all that thrashing around, but am settled, although tired. It is not a proof by Mathematical Induction nor Fermat's Infinite Descent, although it appears as such. I figured out what makes it work, or what forces it to become a summand of two primes. It is not... 12 Aug 2010 06:02
UK maths-- rotten apple, thanks to L Walker
sttscitr...(a)tesco.net wrote: (when the rudeness is cut, there is nothing left) The troubles began when L. Walker said Iain Davidson had a true proof. Iain Davidson sttscitr...(a)tesco.net wrote:  > 1) A natural is prime if it has preceisly two distinct divisors    > 2) Every natural >1 has at least... 12 Aug 2010 07:06
proof of Goldbach without appeal to Galois Algebra, but some new math appears #5.24 Correcting Math
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Let me throw out the last post, as a too tired to think properly with the mistakes of (K-3, 3) , (K-5, 5) for those are not even numbers. Let me start over to see if (K-2,2) can by itself handle all Goldbach repairs. Here are the first twenty five primes: 2, 3, 5,... 12 Aug 2010 06:02
Arithmetic Coder Probability Model $100
do you already knows Arithmetic Codings algorithm .... if so , has a straight forward modification of Aritmetic coding job for you to complete (prefers in C# source codes)... US$100 by Paypal/ Western Union on delivery This presents a basic arithmetic coding implementation, if you have never implemented an arit... 12 Aug 2010 04:57
Hypergeometric function
When trying to solve a differential equation in Mathematica I got Hypergeometric2F1[1,-(rho/A), 1-(rho/A),-e^(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA] as an output. Unfortunately I lack knowledge about hypergeometric functions. Can anybody (maybe some Mathematica Guru's) tell me whether it is possible to turn this output into ... 12 Aug 2010 17:00
Boolean Boogie
>>> In conclusion. If I is an ideal of a Boolean ring B, then I is prime ideal iff I is maximal ideal Right. I is maximal ideal among ideals excluding a iff I is proper prime ideal iff I is maximal ideal. Those iff's should be forward implications. If I ideal Boolean ring B, a not in I,... 12 Aug 2010 07:07
Goldbach, only indeed is a mistake, and, fixed the mistake #5.23 Correcting Math
Let me throw out the last post, as a too tired to think properly with the mistakes of (K-3, 3) , (K-5, 5) for those are not even numbers. Let me start over to see if (K-2,2) can by itself handle all Goldbach repairs. Here are the first twenty five primes: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47... 12 Aug 2010 02:48
Meaning, Presuppositions, Truth-relevance, Goedel's Theorem and the Liar Paradox
Newberry <newberryxy(a)gmail.com> writes: On Aug 11, 6:59 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: Newberry <newberr...(a)gmail.com> writes: A lot of people are absolutely convinced that e.g. PA is consistent. But anyway the point is that IF ~(Ex)Pxm then ~(Ex)[Pxm & ((x = x... 12 Aug 2010 09:17
First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15