Nikon FDUtility
in [Scanners]
|
From: Don on 1 Mar 2006 18:48 On 28 Feb 2006 22:49:30 GMT, Marjolein Katsma <nobody(a)example.net> wrote: >> !=> If you yourself considered the relational model, why are you so >> surprised when I merely submit it for consideration? <=! > >Because I considered it *as a model of the current hierarchical file >system* and rejected it because I found a hierarchical database a *better >model of the current file hierarchical system*. The question was *NOT* why relational model should or should not be rejected/accepted (that's what you tried to answer above and last time). The question is: Why are you surprised when I merely submit it as one of the options for consideration (*without* making any recommendations!). Especially after you yourself considered it! >What I am surprised about is that you do *not* apparently consider >anything at all as a model for the *current hierarchical file system* - >before even discussing a new system And how did you come to that conclusion? It's certainly not based on anything I wrote! I never *recommended* any specific course of action, but merely submitted all options for consideration. Don.
From: Marjolein Katsma on 11 Mar 2006 07:11
Don (phoney.email(a)yahoo.com) wrote in news:vdcc02hutvo4nis1dmu93j36dr7i0in8kv(a)4ax.com: > I never *recommended* any specific course of action, but merely > submitted all options for consideration. Except a basis for comparison :) -- Marjolein Katsma *Help with HomeSite/Studio: http://hshelp.com/ *Travel blog: http://blog.iamback.com/ *Spam reporting addresses: http://banspam.javawoman.com/report3.html |