From: Neil Harrington on

"Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message
news:e385d$4c250453$546ac3cf$31414(a)cache70.multikabel.net...
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:27:55 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote:
>
>> "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message
>> news:d80b9$4c1e4984$546ac3cf$675(a)cache60.multikabel.net...
>>> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue.
>>>
>>> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg
>>
>> Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just
>> that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it.
>> Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo
>> is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea.
>
> It's the second time I applied it to the sea. But the first attempt (with
> long exposures and B/W images) worked a lot better. I posted this image
> about four monts ago:
>
> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg
>
> --
> Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com

Yes, the use of B&W is very interesting -- that would never have occurred to
me. How did you do that?


From: Robert Spanjaard on
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:00:52 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote:

>>> Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just
>>> that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it.
>>> Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo
>>> is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea.
>>
>> It's the second time I applied it to the sea. But the first attempt
>> (with long exposures and B/W images) worked a lot better. I posted this
>> image about four monts ago:
>>
>> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg
>
> Yes, the use of B&W is very interesting -- that would never have
> occurred to me. How did you do that?

Take three shots, convert them to B&W, and then use one exposure for red,
one for green, and one for blue. So the only difference is that you
convert them to B&W before filtering.

--
Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Neil Harrington on

"Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message
news:702d1$4c28be23$546ac3cf$18498(a)cache80.multikabel.net...
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:00:52 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote:
>
>>>> Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just
>>>> that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it.
>>>> Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo
>>>> is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea.
>>>
>>> It's the second time I applied it to the sea. But the first attempt
>>> (with long exposures and B/W images) worked a lot better. I posted this
>>> image about four monts ago:
>>>
>>> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg
>>
>> Yes, the use of B&W is very interesting -- that would never have
>> occurred to me. How did you do that?
>
> Take three shots, convert them to B&W, and then use one exposure for red,
> one for green, and one for blue. So the only difference is that you
> convert them to B&W before filtering.
>
> --
> Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com

Ah. Thanks!


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Where is
Next: Sunday Afternoon