Prev: very slow startup
Next: Intellimouse keyboard problems
From: Unknown on 17 Mar 2010 11:37
Are you really that dense or retarded?
"LD55ZRA" <LD55ZRA(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:hnplc1$pmr$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>
> "Bruce Chambers" <bchambers(a)cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message
> news:ekAhXXYxKHA.2644(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
>> I've tested the most recent recent version (with all updates) version
>> on a brand-new OS installation with no additional applications installed,
>> and certainly none installed and then uninstalled, and CCleaner still
>> managed to "find" over a hundred allegedly orphaned registry entries and
>> dozens of purportedly "suspicious" files,
> You have just proved my point that CCleaner is a fantastic tool nobody
> should be without because it managed to find all orphaned registry entries
> left by Microsoft OS Installation. Windows OS and Applications makes sure
> that everything is properly registered even if something is for temporary
> purposes (for example updates of anti-virus definition files by manual
> downloads are registered and old entries still kept in registry even
> though you may have deleted them!!).
>
> During installation of the OS, system need to unzip many cab files and all
> these have to be registered and after installation, the cab files are
> deleted from temporary folders but entries in the Registry is left to
> indicate to the OS that a particular cab file has been dealt with.
>
> How do you expect an installation file to keep tract of nearly 20,000
> files during installation? Answer: By making sure they are adequately
> registered. No wonder you found over "a hundred allegedly orphaned
> registry entries and dozens of purportedly "suspicious" files". I would
> expect a good registry cleaner to damn find them!
>
> Hope this answers your suspicions and you will refrain from stating this
> over and over again on these newsgroups in connection with registry
> cleaners.
>
> Bye bye troll.
>
>
>
>
>


From: "db" databaseben at hotmail dot on 17 Mar 2010 12:13
I'm not sure what the others
are saying about the safety
scanner being discontinued.

the retail version of
one care was discontinued
a long time ago.

but the online version is
free and functional.

--

db���`�...�><)))�>
DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
- Systems Analyst
- Database Developer
- Accountancy
- Veteran of the Armed Forces
- Microsoft Partner
- @hotmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~"share the nirvana" - dbZen

>
>

"LD55ZRA" <LD55ZRA(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:hnp48v$hgv$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> Bill in Co. wrote:
>
>>Stuck in DBASE-II land?
>>
>>
> He is a "Retired Professional" and should be respected as our senior citizen. We respect Pig-Bear so why not this guy?
>
From: LD55ZRA on 17 Mar 2010 19:25
Unknown wrote:

>Are you really that dense or retarded?
>
>

Best thing is to ask your mum because she s u c k s my c0ck regularly.
Your biological father is nowhere to be found for now because of his
drink and drug addictions.

hth
From: LD55ZRA on 17 Mar 2010 19:27
db wrote:

> I'm not sure what the others
> are saying about the safety
> scanner being discontinued.
>
> the retail version of
> one care was discontinued
> a long time ago.
>
> but the online version is
> free and functional.
>
Db,

I agree with you entirely. Online scanner is still there and likely to
remain for sometime until M$ finds something to replace it.

hth
From: Jose on 18 Mar 2010 08:21
On Mar 17, 12:13 pm, "db" <databaseben at hotmail dot com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what the others
> are saying about the safety
> scanner being discontinued.
>
> the retail version of
> one care was discontinued
> a long time ago.
>
> but the online version is
> free and functional.
>
> --
>
> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
> DatabaseBen, Retired Professional
>  - Systems Analyst
>  - Database Developer
>  - Accountancy
>  - Veteran of the Armed Forces
>  - Microsoft Partner
> -  @hotmail.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~"share the nirvana" - dbZen
>
>
>
>
>
> "LD55ZRA" <LD55...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in messagenews:hnp48v$hgv$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> > Bill in Co. wrote:
>
> >>Stuck in DBASE-II land?
>
> > He is a "Retired Professional" and should be respected as our senior citizen.  We respect Pig-Bear so why not this guy?

Yeah - the online one still works.

I install and uninstall stuff all the time.

I made a backup of my registry.

I ran the online MS one and several others but did not let them make
any changes.

They all reported different things.

Then I ran the MS one and let it fix. I rebooted and had not problems
and ran it again and the original issues were resolved.

I put my registry backup back, and ran the other tools and let them
fix all the problems they found without question - fix everything you
find. No problems.

The issues reported make sense and are either MRU or ARP items and
remnants of things I have installed and uninstalled in the last week
or so. Boring!

Some scanners are more efficient than others, so scanners miss things
others catch.

The MS one is just so-so in my opinion - it missed a lot of things my
other ones report as issues and I think it would be nice if it did
report them but it doesn't. But it did not break anything and neither
did any of the others I ran.

It is "worth it" to me psychologically to know all the remnants from
installed/uninstalled programs are not in the registry. They would
never be removed without a registry cleaner. Their presence does not
effect my performance in any measurable way, and I measure it.

No cleaner decreased my boot time (which I can measure down to the
tenth of a second). The variances were not repeatable and only in the
plus or minus .03 second range which I attribute to global warming.

I did not run any other timing benchmarks because I already know from
having done this kind of testing before there is not any appreciable
difference and they take too long.

Compacting is not the same as cleaning and there are ways to do that
too, but still only tiny often non repeatable measurable improvements
but good psychological feelings.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: very slow startup
Next: Intellimouse keyboard problems