From: Karl E. Peterson on
Karl E. Peterson wrote:
> Chris Dunaway wrote:
>> On Nov 2, 2:11 pm, "Karl E. Peterson" <k...(a)exmvps.org> wrote:
>>> John Smith wrote:
>>> > I will need to update files related to my project regularly (through a
>>> > separate downloader) and would like to store everything in some sort of
>>> > container that can't be edited or modified on the client's machine. How
>>> > should I go about this?
>>>
>>> Alternate Data Streams?
>>
>> Can VB6 open an Alternate Data Stream?
>
> Here ya go: http://vb.mvps.org/samples/Streams/
>
> I'd be interested in feedback from any/all!

And...

Classic VB: Master a Little-Known Quirk of NTFS -- Visual Studio Magazine
http://visualstudiomagazine.com/Articles/2009/11/03/Inside-Alternative-Data-Streams.aspx
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org


From: Larry Serflaten on

"Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote

> >>> Alternate Data Streams?
> >>
> >> Can VB6 open an Alternate Data Stream?
> >
> > Here ya go: http://vb.mvps.org/samples/Streams/
> >
> > I'd be interested in feedback from any/all!

You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in
future OS's...

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763

LFS


From: Karl E. Peterson on
Larry Serflaten wrote:
> "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote
>
>> >>> Alternate Data Streams?
>> >>
>> >> Can VB6 open an Alternate Data Stream?
>> >
>> > Here ya go: http://vb.mvps.org/samples/Streams/
>> >
>> > I'd be interested in feedback from any/all!
>
> You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in
> future OS's...
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763

Okay, first off, let's notice that this article was written for NT 3.1, eh?

And, what they say is that ADS *may* not be supported in future *file* systems, not
future *operating* systems. They do say that NTFS will continue to be supported in
future versions of NT, as well.

So I think saying it "works in NTFS" is pretty accurate, Big Picture-wise, don't
you?
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org


From: Larry Serflaten on

"Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote

> > You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in
> > future OS's...
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763
>
> Okay, first off, let's notice that this article was written for NT 3.1, eh?

Last reviewed in 2006, that's slightly more current than you'd suggest.


> They do say that NTFS will continue to be supported in
> future versions of NT, as well.
>
> So I think saying it "works in NTFS" is pretty accurate, Big Picture-wise, don't
> you?

The fact that there is verbage out there that says ADS may not be supported in future
file systems should have been worth a mention, link, or other such notice. That's all
I'm sayin'

LFS


From: Karl E. Peterson on
Larry Serflaten wrote:
> "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote
>
>> > You might have mentioned that MS may pull the rug out, so to speak, in
>> > future OS's...
>> >
>> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/105763
>>
>> Okay, first off, let's notice that this article was written for NT 3.1, eh?
>
> Last reviewed in 2006, that's slightly more current than you'd suggest.

But the "Applies To" list gives away when it was written, as the very low number
tends to corroborate

>> They do say that NTFS will continue to be supported in
>> future versions of NT, as well.
>>
>> So I think saying it "works in NTFS" is pretty accurate, Big Picture-wise, don't
>> you?
>
> The fact that there is verbage out there that says ADS may not be supported in
> future file systems should have been worth a mention, link, or other such notice.
> That's all I'm sayin'

Yeah, okay, I hear what you're saying. OTOH, no one has ever implied it works
anywhere else, including CDFS which is also a common FS these days. And, I'm pretty
sure most articles, including mine, say that the ADS "goes away" if you copy/move
the file onto a non-NTFS volume.
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org