The absolute frame.
in [Relativity]
|
From: eric gisse on 11 Aug 2010 23:39 Hayek wrote: >>> 1.a does not move, only b moves wrt the absolute >>> frame. [...] >>> SR-ians can make funny claims, >> >> What are "SR-ians"? Do you mean people who used to be >> described as "geometers" in journals such as Nature? > > Fanatics of Special Relativity, who claim that only the > first case is true. Anyone who advocates that SR says that there is an absolute frame does not know what they are talking about. [...]
From: kenseto on 12 Aug 2010 09:18 On Aug 11, 10:38 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Aug 11, 9:31 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 11, 8:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > "GogoJF" wrote in message > > > >news:01945889-2b73-46d9-9c9b-f08d10ca7fd3(a)5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com.... > > > > > Fair enough. I respect your opinion. > > > > I respect yours .. EXCEPT when you claim it is fact. Then you are a nothing > > > but a liar. > > > > The FACT is that the speed of light is finite. It has been MEASURED > > > EXPERIMENTALLY many many times. Your ignorance of that shows just that .. > > > that you are ignorant. > > > > If you choose to ignore reality and invent your own version of physics that > > > is unrelated to the universe we actually inhabit ..go for it. But don't > > > pretend it has any truth or substance. > > > I am almost, wholly, on your side. We think we have a unified science > > one day- oh, and then science gets in the way. > > It has been MEASURED> > EXPERIMENTALLY many many times. > > Excuse me, but how many times is many many? Are you repeating your > uncorrectness? The one-way speed of light never been measured. The two-way speed of light never been measure using physical meter stick to measure distance. The speed of light is a defined constant as follows: i meter length = 1/299,792,458 light-second. Therefore the speed of light is: c=1 light-second/1 second=1 Ken Seto - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: Hayek on 12 Aug 2010 13:24 Inertial wrote: > "Hayek" wrote in message news:4c6309f4$0$22920$e4fe514c(a)news.xs4all.nl... > >> harald wrote: >>> On Aug 10, 8:34 pm, Hayek <haye...(a)nospam.xs4all.nl> >>> wrote: >>>> 1.a does not move, only b moves wrt the absolute >>>> frame. > [snip] >>>> SR-ians can make funny claims, >>> >>> What are "SR-ians"? Do you mean people who used to be >>> described as "geometers" in journals such as Nature? >> >> Fanatics of Special Relativity, who claim that only the >> first case is true. > > No one who understand makes any such claim, as in SR there is NO > absolute frame. > > You clearly no little about SR and what it says You do not even understand what I try to tell you, so you should not judge others. Uwe Hayek. -- We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion : the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history. -- Ayn Rand I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. -- Thomas Jefferson. Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. -- Winston Churchill.
From: Hayek on 12 Aug 2010 13:26 eric gisse wrote: > Hayek wrote: > >>>> 1.a does not move, only b moves wrt the absolute >>>> frame. > [...] >>>> SR-ians can make funny claims, >>> What are "SR-ians"? Do you mean people who used to be >>> described as "geometers" in journals such as Nature? >> Fanatics of Special Relativity, who claim that only the >> first case is true. > > Anyone who advocates that SR says that there is an absolute frame does not > know what they are talking about. I did not say that, but hey, I am not even expecting that you can understand a sentence. Uwe Hayek. -- We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion : the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history. -- Ayn Rand I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. -- Thomas Jefferson. Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. -- Winston Churchill.
From: Inertial on 12 Aug 2010 19:55
"Hayek" wrote in message news:4c642e59$0$22937$e4fe514c(a)news.xs4all.nl... > >Inertial wrote: >> "Hayek" wrote in message >> news:4c6309f4$0$22920$e4fe514c(a)news.xs4all.nl... >> >>> harald wrote: >>>> On Aug 10, 8:34 pm, Hayek <haye...(a)nospam.xs4all.nl> >>>> wrote: >>>>> 1.a does not move, only b moves wrt the absolute >>>>> frame. >> [snip] >>>>> SR-ians can make funny claims, >>>> >>>> What are "SR-ians"? Do you mean people who used to be >>>> described as "geometers" in journals such as Nature? >>> >>> Fanatics of Special Relativity, who claim that only the >>> first case is true. >> >> No one who understand makes any such claim, as in SR there is NO absolute >> frame. >> >> You clearly no little about SR and what it says > >You do not even understand what I try to tell you, I understand .. you make it clear you don't know SR as you are talking about absolute frames in SR and have other misconceptions as I recall. >so you should not judge others. No reason why I should not judge what you post. |