From: Alexander Nickolov on
There's at least one exception at least at the moment: Mac OS X
is FreeBSD - a Unix flavor. That may cause you to change your
thinking - it already changed ours...

--
=====================================
Alexander Nickolov
Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
email: agnickolov(a)mvps.org
MVP VC FAQ: http://vcfaq.mvps.org
=====================================

"Giovanni Dicanio" <giovanni.dicanio(a)invalid.it> wrote in message
news:OxMWkTs%23HHA.3548(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "Kenneth Porter" <shiva.blacklist(a)sewingwitch.com> ha scritto nel
> messaggio news:Xns99B02BE0F3C05shivawellcom(a)207.46.248.16...
>
>> Recalling that the OP is from the *nix world, if one is considering
>> redesigning the GUI, one might also consider a portable GUI framework,
>> such
>> as QT or wxWidgets. I've been using wx and I really like the Java-like
>> sizer-based control layout.
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't have programming experience with QT, so I can't express an opinion
> about it.
> However, I don't like wxWidgets. For example, the documentation is really
> *poor*.
>
> I needed to have a custom grid with radio buttons inside a cell.
> Then I went to wxGrid documentation, and I just read a dummy sample here:
>
> http://www.wxwidgets.org/manuals/2.6/wx_gridoverview.html#gridoverview
>
> the really interesting examples are just ... "Yet to be written..."?!??
>
> What kind of professional style is that??
>
> I don't trust an undocumented library, with no serious IDE support.
>
> I've tried wxDev-C++ and it is a fragile *toy*: the opposite of the
> concept of robust quality tool. The GUI designer is broken. The IDE is
> something of the pre-VC6 era: maybe Notepad would be even better.
>
> If one has had an experience of Visual C++ and MFC, and the support that
> Visual C++ offers to MFC development (exspecially in VC6) via ClassWizard,
> or other wizards, or other IDE tools, and the super-rich documentation
> about MFC, and the avability of real *jewels* like CodeProject
> (www.codeproject.com), then things like wxWidgets just vanish, IMHO.
>
> BTW: Have you any idea about how to put three radio buttons into a cell of
> a wxGrid? :)
>
> Moreover, I don't like the idea of portable GUI framework a lot.
>
> Frankly speaking, considering that Windows platform has a very big
> penetration in the market (my understanding is that Windows penetration is
> huge not only in desktop systems, but also on the servers!), I don't care
> about Unix (BTW: which Unix? Linux? Sun? HP? and which Linux? KDE? GNOME?
> SuSE? Debian? Ubuntu...? IMHO, it's a chaos...) or portability.
>
> I prefer to focus on a high-quality environment like .NET framework, that
> is a great Microsoft's technology IMHO, with great tools, and has an high
> quality support (from MSDN documentation, web forums, NNTP-based
> newsgroups, etc.).
> And the Visual C#/VB 2005 Express Editions are super if you compare them
> to wxDev-C++.
>
> Just my 2 cents
>
> Giovanni
>
>


From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] on

"Scott McPhillips [MVP]" <org-dot-mvps-at-scottmcp> wrote in message
news:eQ$fLxm%23HHA.5404(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "Tom Serface" <tom.nospam(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message
> news:uj1ffpm%23HHA.600(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Man it's hard to see how anyone can get those version number mixed up :o)
>>
>> Tom
>
> I started with VC1.0.
> If I recall, there was never a VC3, and we went from VC4 to VC4.2
>

But there was VC1.5 (which I think was the last 16-bit version).


From: Tom Serface on
VC 1.52, may it RIP :o)

Tom

"Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]" <rbv(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:us1pRZ8%23HHA.4592(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> "Scott McPhillips [MVP]" <org-dot-mvps-at-scottmcp> wrote in message
> news:eQ$fLxm%23HHA.5404(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> "Tom Serface" <tom.nospam(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message
>> news:uj1ffpm%23HHA.600(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> Man it's hard to see how anyone can get those version number mixed up
>>> :o)
>>>
>>> Tom
>>
>> I started with VC1.0.
>> If I recall, there was never a VC3, and we went from VC4 to VC4.2
>>
>
> But there was VC1.5 (which I think was the last 16-bit version).
>

From: Alexander Nickolov on
Well, there _was_ 1.51 before 1.52, and I believe there was
1.50 as well. The others are just upgrades with minor fixes.

--
=====================================
Alexander Nickolov
Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
email: agnickolov(a)mvps.org
MVP VC FAQ: http://vcfaq.mvps.org
=====================================

"Tom Serface" <tom.nospam(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message
news:Om%23WynF$HHA.3716(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> VC 1.52, may it RIP :o)
>
> Tom
>
> "Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]" <rbv(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> news:us1pRZ8%23HHA.4592(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "Scott McPhillips [MVP]" <org-dot-mvps-at-scottmcp> wrote in message
>> news:eQ$fLxm%23HHA.5404(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> "Tom Serface" <tom.nospam(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uj1ffpm%23HHA.600(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> Man it's hard to see how anyone can get those version number mixed up
>>>> :o)
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>
>>> I started with VC1.0.
>>> If I recall, there was never a VC3, and we went from VC4 to VC4.2
>>>
>>
>> But there was VC1.5 (which I think was the last 16-bit version).
>>
>


From: Tom Serface on
Yeah, I just remember all the hoopla that went on when Microsoft went to 32
bit only. We kept the 1.52c compiler around for a long time (I suspect some
people still use it). I don't think they did any versions after that. Not
that I used anyway.

Tom

"Alexander Nickolov" <agnickolov(a)mvps.org> wrote in message
news:uuCf6FI$HHA.5160(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Well, there _was_ 1.51 before 1.52, and I believe there was
> 1.50 as well. The others are just upgrades with minor fixes.
>
> --
> =====================================
> Alexander Nickolov
> Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
> email: agnickolov(a)mvps.org
> MVP VC FAQ: http://vcfaq.mvps.org
> =====================================
>
> "Tom Serface" <tom.nospam(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message
> news:Om%23WynF$HHA.3716(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> VC 1.52, may it RIP :o)
>>