VC++ 6.0 To .NET
in [Visual C]
|
Prev: Error LNK2028 unresolved token / LNK2019 Unrevolved external symbol
Next: IJolietDiscMaster->AddData returning STG_E_INVALIDFUNCTION
From: Kenneth Porter on 3 Oct 2007 17:09 "Giovanni Dicanio" <giovanni.dicanio(a)invalid.it> wrote in news:OlTb8QBBIHA.4232(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl: > I beg to differ with your assertion about MS documentation. And I > think that the documentation (and tutorials, and samples) offered > about MFC by books or great web-sites like CodeProject is superior to > what is offered for wxWindows. I don't disagree that MFC's documentation, when you count CodeProject and all the 3rd party books, is superior to wx. If you throw a ton of doc writers at a project, and then add all the developers who had to burn their fingers finding all the hidden traps in the official documentation, one would hope that the resulting community knowledge base would be stellar. You've inspired me to go involve myself more with the wx wiki. :D
From: Giovanni Dicanio on 3 Oct 2007 17:58 "Kenneth Porter" <shiva.blacklist(a)sewingwitch.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:Xns99BE900BEB009shivawellcom(a)207.46.248.16... > You've inspired me to go involve myself more with the wx wiki. :D :)) G
From: Tom Serface on 3 Oct 2007 18:35
To be honest, even though MFC was a great improvement over previous paradigms of its time, I think the community really made it happen. There was a ton of free control and advice available almost immediately. It was kind of a phenomenon. Tom "Kenneth Porter" <shiva.blacklist(a)sewingwitch.com> wrote in message news:Xns99BE900BEB009shivawellcom(a)207.46.248.16... > "Giovanni Dicanio" <giovanni.dicanio(a)invalid.it> wrote in > news:OlTb8QBBIHA.4232(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl: > >> I beg to differ with your assertion about MS documentation. And I >> think that the documentation (and tutorials, and samples) offered >> about MFC by books or great web-sites like CodeProject is superior to >> what is offered for wxWindows. > > I don't disagree that MFC's documentation, when you count CodeProject and > all the 3rd party books, is superior to wx. If you throw a ton of doc > writers at a project, and then add all the developers who had to burn > their > fingers finding all the hidden traps in the official documentation, one > would hope that the resulting community knowledge base would be stellar. > > You've inspired me to go involve myself more with the wx wiki. :D |