From: Jim on
"Metspitzer" <kilowatt(a)charter.net> wrote in message
news:50u266djpapsdkcli1m1f2suituc3ioo1n(a)4ax.com...
> One end is for a computer and the other end is for cable or antenna.
> Neither of which should be for "on the go"
You might not need an antenna or just a small one if the signal is strong
enough. Before the analog cutoff I used to get a couple of stations with
just rabbit ears.


From: GMAN on
In article <50u266djpapsdkcli1m1f2suituc3ioo1n(a)4ax.com>, Metspitzer <kilowatt(a)charter.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:23:35 +0000 (UTC), david <none(a)nospam.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:19:17 -0400, Metspitzer rearranged some electrons
>>to say:
>>
>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:15:39 -0500, "David Harper"
>>> <dharperhoutx(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Rick" <rick0.merrill(a)gmail.com.lessspam> wrote in message
>>>>news:i3p9cv$7lf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Jim wrote:
>>>>>> "Metspitzer"<kilowatt(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ijir56pl8v5ril34pjtvtvc5mbj1ojpg92(a)4ax.com...
>>>>>>> I would think if someone was on the road all the time a USB type
>>>>>>> Internet would be cool. It may even be enough entertainment.
>>>>>> They make USB ATSC tuners.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> DO they make USB QAM tuners?
>>>>
>>>>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?
>>Item=N82E16815260023&cm_re=USB_QAM_tuners-_-15-260-023-_-Product
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It would be useless for "on the go"
>>
>>Why? Seems pretty compact to me.
>
>One end is for a computer and the other end is for cable or antenna.
>Neither of which should be for "on the go"
It comes with a little antenna. look at the pictures on newegg
From: david on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:03:29 -0400, Metspitzer rearranged some electrons
to say:

> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:23:35 +0000 (UTC), david <none(a)nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:19:17 -0400, Metspitzer rearranged some electrons
>>to say:
>>
>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:15:39 -0500, "David Harper"
>>> <dharperhoutx(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Rick" <rick0.merrill(a)gmail.com.lessspam> wrote in message
>>>>news:i3p9cv$7lf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Jim wrote:
>>>>>> "Metspitzer"<kilowatt(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ijir56pl8v5ril34pjtvtvc5mbj1ojpg92(a)4ax.com...
>>>>>>> I would think if someone was on the road all the time a USB type
>>>>>>> Internet would be cool. It may even be enough entertainment.
>>>>>> They make USB ATSC tuners.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> DO they make USB QAM tuners?
>>>>
>>>>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?
>>Item=N82E16815260023&cm_re=USB_QAM_tuners-_-15-260-023-_-Product
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It would be useless for "on the go"
>>
>>Why? Seems pretty compact to me.
>
> One end is for a computer and the other end is for cable or antenna.
> Neither of which should be for "on the go"

I'm wondering how you think you're going to receive any TV signals
without a connection to a signal source (whether it's an antenna, or
cable).
From: GMAN on
In article <i3t0t8$snd$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, david <none(a)nospam.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:03:29 -0400, Metspitzer rearranged some electrons
>to say:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:23:35 +0000 (UTC), david <none(a)nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:19:17 -0400, Metspitzer rearranged some electrons
>>>to say:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:15:39 -0500, "David Harper"
>>>> <dharperhoutx(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Rick" <rick0.merrill(a)gmail.com.lessspam> wrote in message
>>>>>news:i3p9cv$7lf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Jim wrote:
>>>>>>> "Metspitzer"<kilowatt(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:ijir56pl8v5ril34pjtvtvc5mbj1ojpg92(a)4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> I would think if someone was on the road all the time a USB type
>>>>>>>> Internet would be cool. It may even be enough entertainment.
>>>>>>> They make USB ATSC tuners.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> DO they make USB QAM tuners?
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?
>>>Item=N82E16815260023&cm_re=USB_QAM_tuners-_-15-260-023-_-Product
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It would be useless for "on the go"
>>>
>>>Why? Seems pretty compact to me.
>>
>> One end is for a computer and the other end is for cable or antenna.
>> Neither of which should be for "on the go"
>
>I'm wondering how you think you're going to receive any TV signals
>without a connection to a signal source (whether it's an antenna, or
>cable).

It comes with an antenna.

From: david on
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:51:18 +0000, GMAN rearranged some electrons to say:

> In article <i3t0t8$snd$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, david
> <none(a)nospam.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:03:29 -0400, Metspitzer rearranged some electrons
>>to say:
>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:23:35 +0000 (UTC), david <none(a)nospam.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:19:17 -0400, Metspitzer rearranged some
>>>>electrons to say:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:15:39 -0500, "David Harper"
>>>>> <dharperhoutx(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Rick" <rick0.merrill(a)gmail.com.lessspam> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:i3p9cv$7lf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Jim wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Metspitzer"<kilowatt(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:ijir56pl8v5ril34pjtvtvc5mbj1ojpg92(a)4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> I would think if someone was on the road all the time a USB type
>>>>>>>>> Internet would be cool. It may even be enough entertainment.
>>>>>>>> They make USB ATSC tuners.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DO they make USB QAM tuners?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?
>>>>Item=N82E16815260023&cm_re=USB_QAM_tuners-_-15-260-023-_-Product
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> It would be useless for "on the go"
>>>>
>>>>Why? Seems pretty compact to me.
>>>
>>> One end is for a computer and the other end is for cable or antenna.
>>> Neither of which should be for "on the go"
>>
>>I'm wondering how you think you're going to receive any TV signals
>>without a connection to a signal source (whether it's an antenna, or
>>cable).
>
> It comes with an antenna.

I saw that, but I'm not sure what the OP was thinking when he said that
an antenna was useless for "on the go". Perhaps he doesn't know that the
frequencies of TV stations are low enough that a built-in antenna
wouldn't be very practical (the device would have to be very large). Or
that the market for such a device would be small especially if someone
*wanted* to connect their cable service to it, and couldn't.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Connecting SATA HDDs and DVD Drives
Next: GA-790XTA-UD4 Fun