From: Savageduck on
On 2010-07-08 08:26:57 -0700, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> said:

> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:24:56 +0100, in
> <soCdneCC94ZVcKjRnZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk>, bugbear
> <bugbear(a)trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
>
>> John Navas wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:31:18 -0700 (PDT), in
>>> <6c81b637-16dd-4a90-9a66-13563acefea6(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, Val
>>> Hallah <michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1293029/Birds-Andrew-Zuckermans-high-definition-photographs-new-book.html

Amazing
>>>>
>>> images, but a bit garish for my taste, more science than art.
>>
>> What's interesting (to me) is that even the web-size versions
>> of the images in the linked-to page look noticeably sharp and crisp.
>
> Yes, but artificially so (to my eyes at least).

To me these seem more like illustration than photograph, very much
along the lines of a Roger Tory Peterson, or Sibley Field Guide.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

From: Allen on
Savageduck wrote:
> On 2010-07-08 08:26:57 -0700, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> said:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:24:56 +0100, in
>> <soCdneCC94ZVcKjRnZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk>, bugbear
>> <bugbear(a)trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
>>
>>> John Navas wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:31:18 -0700 (PDT), in
>>>> <6c81b637-16dd-4a90-9a66-13563acefea6(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Val
>>>> Hallah <michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1293029/Birds-Andrew-Zuckermans-high-definition-photographs-new-book.html
>>>>>
>
> Amazing
>>>>>
>>>> images, but a bit garish for my taste, more science than art.
>>>
>>> What's interesting (to me) is that even the web-size versions
>>> of the images in the linked-to page look noticeably sharp and crisp.
>>
>> Yes, but artificially so (to my eyes at least).
>
> To me these seem more like illustration than photograph, very much along
> the lines of a Roger Tory Peterson, or Sibley Field Guide.
>
Right on.
Allen
From: Peter on
"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:8hob36l4a6pfmhpoppsj4gk3s4jtpn7bju(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:31:18 -0700 (PDT), in
> <6c81b637-16dd-4a90-9a66-13563acefea6(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, Val
> Hallah <michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1293029/Birds-Andrew-Zuckermans-high-definition-photographs-new-book.html
>
> Amazing images, but a bit garish for my taste, more science than art.
>


I am trying to craft my comment, artfully.

Science is certainly on of the uses of photography. While there may very
well be art in a science shot, the lack of art does not make it an
uninteresting shot.

I think the shots were excellent if considered as an accurate representation
of the birds involved.
--
Peter

From: John Navas on
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:39:32 -0400, in
<4c3653e5$0$5533$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, "Peter"
<peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:8hob36l4a6pfmhpoppsj4gk3s4jtpn7bju(a)4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:31:18 -0700 (PDT), in
>> <6c81b637-16dd-4a90-9a66-13563acefea6(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, Val
>> Hallah <michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1293029/Birds-Andrew-Zuckermans-high-definition-photographs-new-book.html
>>
>> Amazing images, but a bit garish for my taste, more science than art.
>
>I am trying to craft my comment, artfully.
>
>Science is certainly on of the uses of photography. While there may very
>well be art in a science shot, the lack of art does not make it an
>uninteresting shot.
>
>I think the shots were excellent if considered as an accurate representation
>of the birds involved.

Fair enough, but I see them as more technical than art, because the
lighting is so flat -- I'm more attracted to natural highlights and
shadows.

--
John

"Assumption is the mother of all screw ups."
[Wethern�s Law of Suspended Judgement]
From: Floyd L. Davidson on
"Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:8hob36l4a6pfmhpoppsj4gk3s4jtpn7bju(a)4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:31:18 -0700 (PDT), in
>> <6c81b637-16dd-4a90-9a66-13563acefea6(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, Val
>> Hallah <michaelnewport(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1293029/Birds-Andrew-Zuckermans-high-definition-photographs-new-book.html
>>
>> Amazing images, but a bit garish for my taste, more science than art.
>>
>
>I am trying to craft my comment, artfully.
>
>Science is certainly on of the uses of photography. While there may very
>well be art in a science shot, the lack of art does not make it an
>uninteresting shot.
>
>I think the shots were excellent if considered as an accurate representation
>of the birds involved.

I was talking with a young lady a few days ago about
photography and art, and when I suggested to her that
the concept (which she very clearly understood) of an
image as a medium to communicate a message to a viewer
was something many photographers did not understand, and
that I was pleased to see that she did understand it...

She responded by sayng, "But I'm not a photographer! I'm
an artist who uses photography."

One of her most recent shows, which is now on tour, was
15 images of herself, all distinctly different, all with
a white background, and very similar in many ways to the
bird images cited above. (Incidentally, the 15 images
were very carefully planned, and shot using 4x5 sheet
film.)

<http://ericalord.com/section/22658_Un_Defined_Self_Portrait_series.html>

For a very different view (my art, as opposed to her's) of
just who she is,

<http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson/gallery2/d3s_5221.s.jpg>
<http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson/gallery2/d3s_5504.s.jpg>

I would suggest that anyone who does not see art in the
bird pictures of Andrew-Zuckermans is not an artist, but
just a photographer. His work is not "standard"
photography, but is art at a level well beyond what most
photography represents.

(The "young lady", Erica Lord, teaches Art at the
University of Alaska Fairbank, has a Masters degree in
Art from Chicago's School of Art Institute, and has
exhibited her work at the Smithsonian's National Museum
of the American Indian.)

--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd(a)apaflo.com