help re removing my invalid.com
in [JavaScript]
|
From: Geoff on 20 Mar 2010 21:56 On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:36:58 -0400, Dr_Kral(a)nyc.rr.com.invalid wrote: >>>Why not use .invalid domain instead? >> >>I did and was told that this was wrong by Dr_Kal !! > >Geoff, > >I said that <geoff(a)invalid.com> was a VALID e-mail address and therefore >you should not use it. Take a look at the home page of <invalid.com> > >The domain <invalid.invalid> does not exist at the pressent. I see - had not realised that. re that other matter - I think I may have got the message?! http://www.micro-active.com/a-wm2/a-test-reshow2.htm Cheers Geoff > >Y.
From: Dr J R Stockton on 21 Mar 2010 12:22 In comp.lang.javascript message <dm29q5dm1mismeqm7t9oqei35cr9tioseb(a)4ax. com>, Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:44:20, Geoff <gcoxexcludethispart(a)freeuk.com> posted: >>I hope Ihave removed the invalid.com type email address for myself. >> >>Does this seem OK? It's a bit hard on Gareth Charles O'Xenophon Excludethispart, if he should happen to be a freeuk.com user. For that sort of reason, and others, using a made-up left part at freeuk should be prohibited by freeuk's terms & conditions. You should use either an address that you have a positive right to use, or something ending in .invalid, so that nice people know that it is not really an address. If the .invalid is removed, then either - it should leave an address that you have a positive right to use; - it should leave something which will, under current or foreseeable rules, be easily seen as not deliverable. However, it may be helpful if the address is recognisably, by a human, probably yours. Similar considerations apply to message-IDs; in the past, most of the spam that was directed at me was directed to a full or partial message- ID. The personal name that you use in a set of related newsgroups, independently of the E-address, should be probably-unique. A single common name is not enough. -- (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links. Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (RFCs 5536/7) Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (RFCs 5536/7)
From: Geoff on 22 Mar 2010 02:48 On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:22:01 +0000, Dr J R Stockton <reply1011(a)merlyn.demon.co.uk> wrote: >In comp.lang.javascript message <dm29q5dm1mismeqm7t9oqei35cr9tioseb(a)4ax. >com>, Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:44:20, Geoff <gcoxexcludethispart(a)freeuk.com> >posted: > >>>I hope Ihave removed the invalid.com type email address for myself. >>> >>>Does this seem OK? > >It's a bit hard on Gareth Charles O'Xenophon Excludethispart, if he >should happen to be a freeuk.com user. For that sort of reason, and >others, using a made-up left part at freeuk should be prohibited by >freeuk's terms & conditions. I have changed yet again - to geoff(a)invalid.invalid perhaps this is better? Cheers Geoff
From: Dr_Kral on 22 Mar 2010 13:53 On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:56:41 +0000, Geoff <geoff(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in <m1vaq5h3o8ftdev6q1scunigjp4sniecut(a)4ax.com>: >re that other matter - I think I may have got the message?! > >http://www.micro-active.com/a-wm2/a-test-reshow2.htm Geoff, Yes, have got the faintest bit of it. This constant over control makes the questionnaire quite unusable for reasons I already discussed. You might start with the other questionnaire form you referenced and add the few lines of code to show/hide the explanatory Q&A. K.
From: Geoff on 22 Mar 2010 16:29
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:53:16 -0400, Dr_Kral(a)nyc.rr.com.invalid wrote: >On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:56:41 +0000, Geoff <geoff(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in ><m1vaq5h3o8ftdev6q1scunigjp4sniecut(a)4ax.com>: > >>re that other matter - I think I may have got the message?! >> >>http://www.micro-active.com/a-wm2/a-test-reshow2.htm > >Geoff, > >Yes, have got the faintest bit of it. > >This constant over control makes the questionnaire quite unusable for >reasons I already discussed. > >You might start with the other questionnaire form you referenced and add >the few lines of code to show/hide the explanatory Q&A. K. I have done exact;y that! Cheers Geoff > >K. |