Prev: For all those jQuery fanboys
Next: FAQ Topic - What are object models? (2010-03-21)
From: Geoff on 20 Mar 2010 04:42
Hello

I hope Ihave removed the invalid.com type email address for myself.

Does this seem OK?

Cheers

Geoff
From: Geoff on 20 Mar 2010 04:44
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:42:33 +0000, Geoff
<gcoxexcludethispart(a)freeuk.com> wrote:

>Hello
>
>I hope Ihave removed the invalid.com type email address for myself.
>
>Does this seem OK?

Not quite there - this may be better?

Geoff


>
>Cheers
>
>Geoff
From: The Natural Philosopher on 20 Mar 2010 07:09
Geoff wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:42:33 +0000, Geoff
> <gcoxexcludethispart(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I hope Ihave removed the invalid.com type email address for myself.
>>
>> Does this seem OK?
>
> Not quite there - this may be better?
>
> Geoff
>

still easily spammable by a human.

Why not use .invalid domain instead?


>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Geoff
From: Geoff on 20 Mar 2010 07:17
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:09:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:

>Geoff wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:42:33 +0000, Geoff
>> <gcoxexcludethispart(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I hope Ihave removed the invalid.com type email address for myself.
>>>
>>> Does this seem OK?
>>
>> Not quite there - this may be better?
>>
>> Geoff
>>
>
>still easily spammable by a human.
>
>Why not use .invalid domain instead?

I did and was told that this was wrong by Dr_Kal !!

I have reverted to the invalid idea - this OK?

Cheers

Geoff

>
>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Geoff
From: Geoff on 20 Mar 2010 07:20
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:09:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:

spelling of invalid now correct ...

Geoff
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: For all those jQuery fanboys
Next: FAQ Topic - What are object models? (2010-03-21)