From: Ray Fischer on 29 May 2010 13:27
sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 29 May, 07:58, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> whisky-dave <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote:
>> >"sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >> Nobody is claiming that anyone who owns a bitstring or other
>> >> information is forced to disclose it, even though it belongs to the
>> >> public domain.
>> >Why are you claiming it belongs in the public domain.
>> Because he wants it and doesn't want to pay for it.
>Because there is no way to define the public domain
Yes there is.
>You can't distinguish between bitstrings that are private intellectual
>property and bitstrings
>that belong to the public domain
Yes you can, dumbass crook.
From: sobriquet on 29 May 2010 17:14
On 29 May, 19:27, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>[.. babbling ..]
You are a nazi cockroach that belongs in jail along with all the rest
of the nazi scum that fail to respect human rights.