Another Micoshfat centric myth dies: 75% of Linux developers are now paid
in [UK Linux]
|
Prev: Loony problems
Next: 7 proves he can't do simple math (was: Another Micoshfat centric myth dies: 75% of Linux developers are now paid)
From: Rex Ballard on 22 Jan 2010 16:25 On Jan 21, 4:49 pm, 7 <website_has_em...(a)www.enemygadgets.com> wrote: > Another Micoshfat centric myth dies: 75% of Linux developers are now paid > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wherever you turn, Linux is now a highly paid profession with support > and paid up engineers. > http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm > Linux has turned from hobby to strict businesses reliant on it > like all the stock exchanges around the world and military. Even before Linux, Open Source Software, such as BSD UNIX, provided lucrative income for millions of professionals, including server adminstrators, consultantts, solution delivery, documentation, support, education, and business critical applications. Linux just made Open Source more visible because so many distributions were based almost entirely on Open Source applications. Commercial vendors often add binary-only and proprietary drivers, applications, and technology to enhance the capabilities of their distributions. > The joke is on micoshaft to produce cheaper products than Linux > instead of milking customers for everything they got. The big difference is that most of the money spent on Linux and OSS based projects are focused on tailoring the solutions to the business needs of the organization. With Windows centric projects, most of the money is spent tailoring the business practices of the organizations to the capabilities and limitations of the proprietary "shrink- wrapped" software. Windows based solutions are a bit like trying to buy women's clothes "off the rack" at the 5,7, and 9 shop. As long as your size 5, 7, or 9, and average height, you have a nice selection. If you are larger than size 10, tall, have long arms or long legs, you will probably not be able to find anything that doesn't look absurd on you. Linux is more like buying a man's suit at Burlington Coat Factory. You pick out the right color/fabric in sizes ranging from 32 to 60 inch chest/waist, then a tailor makes the final alterations to give you pants and cuffs that are the perfect length - usually within an hour. > http://www.livecdlist.comhttp://www.distrowatch.com
From: Erik Funkenbusch on 22 Jan 2010 23:11 On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:46:42 GMT, 7 wrote: >> No, 7. >> >> 75% of the code in the linux kernel is written by paid developers. >> >> That 75% of code could have been written by 1 person, or 2000, but >> regardless, the amount of code is not equal to the number of programmers. > > Oh! Doooh!!!!!! > > Can't your read fool? > 75% of LINUX DEVELOPERS are still paid Linux developers whether its 1 person > or 1 million+ Linux programmers!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You're functionally retarded 7. And i'm not sure about the functional. Not only does that statement not parse, it semantically invalid.
From: cc on 23 Jan 2010 13:14 On Jan 22, 5:46 pm, 7 <website_has_em...(a)www.enemygadgets.com> wrote: > > > Can't your read fool? > 75% of LINUX DEVELOPERS are still paid Linux developers whether its 1 person > or 1 million+ Linux programmers!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Classic. 100% of 7's posts make sense whether it's 0 posts, or 1 million+ posts.
From: 7 on 23 Jan 2010 14:57 Micoshaft Appil asstroturfing fraudster with a big girlie butt pounding the sock Erik Funkenbusch wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Appil Department of Marketing: >>> No, 7. >>> >>> 75% of the code in the linux kernel is written by paid developers. >>> >>> That 75% of code could have been written by 1 person, or 2000, but >>> regardless, the amount of code is not equal to the number of >>> programmers. >> >> Oh! Doooh!!!!!! >> >> Can't your read fool? >> 75% of LINUX DEVELOPERS are still paid Linux developers whether its 1 >> person or 1 million+ Linux programmers!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > You're functionally retarded 7. > > And i'm not sure about the functional. > > Not only does that statement not parse, it semantically invalid. I'm sure micoshaft cool aid hallucingens work best on retards like you.
From: fidelity on 23 Jan 2010 15:55
The fuckchop called7 wrote: > >I'm an utter cretin! > Confession is good for the soul they say. |