DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Is Gravitational Force Dependent on a Falling Object's Speed?
Next: Roberts: Explain to Gisse what a Metric is!!
From: George Hammond on 9 Dec 2009 19:30 LOG 12-9-09 THE DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH Copyright December 2009, George Hammond In a previous USENET post (above) I detailed how a short millisecond signal in the microtubule system of the brain at Froehlich�s frequency could easily contain a year of human experience, and thus even though the bedside observer would see the person expire in a fraction of a second, the dearly departed would subjectively live on for a year in cyber-paradise despite his Frohlich-speed millisecond demise. I�ve been thinking some more about the death stream download after talking to Stuart Hameroff by e-mail. Supposedly the death dream would be pre-recorded in a running-edit mode during your entire life, every hour, every second of every day. It would constantly be edited and distilled, sort of the same process that they use to cut and edit a Hollywood movie. This in fact, might even be the primary function of nocturnal dreaming. So this edited life after death scenario, or dream, is residing in the microtubule system of the brain ready to download in a few milliseconds at a moments notice should death occur. The question then arises as to why this dream would automatically download when you die. My answer to that is that it must be completely natural, that is a default mechanism of the death process itself. Supposedly, the death dream is created by a natural mechanism having to do with the growth deficit of the brain, and then when you die, this pent-up font of "flat space" reality, by the same token, just automatically bursts forth and floods the entire cytoskeleton of the brain. And this is what produces "life after death" so-called. The underlying idea here is that the well-known Secular Trend growth deficit causes a neuron shortage and therefore the brain cannot actually perceive "true reality", that is "flat subjective space"�.. it can only perceive a "curved version" (truncation) of subjective space-time� a "curved version" of reality as it were. However, our brain is able to detect that what we are seeing is not completely real, i.e. is curved rather than flat, so what it does, in some analog fashion or other, is compute the "flat space extrapolation" of what we actually see. Of course the microtubule system cannot present this extrapolation to the neuronal system because the neuronal system is not big enough to display it. But it remains "pent-up" or "latent" somewhere in the cytoskeleton, and through some process of subconscious mentation, dreaming etc., it gets composed and edited into what we are now calling "an afterlife dream world". Okay, that is how and why it gets composed. Now we have to address, how and why it downloads at death. Presumably, death occurs from the top down. That is, the neuronal system shuts down or "flat lines" first. And then begins the slower process of the disintegration of the cytoskeleton-microtubule system. My first intuition would be that the flat lining of the neuronal system is what triggers the afterlife download in the cytoskeleton. Perhaps for instance, the neuronal-cytoskeletal system is originally a "closed loop" feedback system and when the neuronal system flatlines at death the cytoskeleton system goes "open-loop" and this simply causes the cytoskeleton system to "dump" any heretofore undisplayed information into the entire cytoskeleton whereas previously it was negative feedback from the neuronal system that was truncating that information and keeping it in check, i.e. keeping it pent-up in the microtubule memory. That�s one of certainly many possibilities. And I must add here, that this death dream signal may not only flood just the cytoskeleton of the brain, it could just as easily flood the cytoskeleton of the entire body since the entire cytoskeleton of the brain is interconnected by microwave �gap junctions�. This means that your entire body and your entire brain, your entire sensory apparatus, motor apparatus, and cognitive system would be experiencing this dream firsthand. It would in other words, be completely real! This is why the microtubule computer in the brain is sufficient to do the job of Tipler�s "astronomical sized"computer". His computer was designed to synthesize a human being from scratch, while nature has the advantage of having the actual physical body in the form of the cytoskeleton actually present in the microtubule computer! This reduces the size of the necessary computer by a "double exponential" sized factor! And this literally brings the problem down to earth. Serious intellectual commentary is invited, hecklers will be killfiled. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: darwinist on 9 Dec 2009 17:07 On Dec 10, 11:30 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > LOG 12-9-09 THE DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > > Copyright December 2009, George Hammond > > In a previous USENET post (above) I detailed how a short > millisecond signal in the microtubule system of the brain at > Froehlich s frequency could easily contain a year of human > experience, and thus even though the bedside observer would > see the person expire in a fraction of a second, the dearly > departed would subjectively live on for a year in > cyber-paradise despite his Frohlich-speed millisecond > demise. > I ve been thinking some more about the death stream > download after talking to Stuart Hameroff by e-mail. > Supposedly the death dream would be pre-recorded in a > running-edit mode during your entire life, every hour, every > second of every day. It would constantly be edited and > distilled, sort of the same process that they use to cut and > edit a Hollywood movie. This in fact, might even be the > primary function of nocturnal dreaming. > So this edited life after death scenario, or dream, is > residing in the microtubule system of the brain ready to > download in a few milliseconds at a moments notice should > death occur. The question then arises as to why this dream > would automatically download when you die. My answer to > that is that it must be completely natural, that is a > default mechanism of the death process itself. Supposedly, > the death dream is created by a natural mechanism having to > do with the growth deficit of the brain, and then when you > die, this pent-up font of "flat space" reality, by the same > token, just automatically bursts forth and floods the entire > cytoskeleton of the brain. And this is what produces "life > after death" so-called. > The underlying idea here is that the well-known Secular > Trend growth deficit causes a neuron shortage and therefore > the brain cannot actually perceive "true reality", that is > "flat subjective space" .. it can only perceive a "curved > version" (truncation) of subjective space-time a "curved > version" of reality as it were. However, our brain is able > to detect that what we are seeing is not completely real, > i.e. is curved rather than flat, so what it does, in some > analog fashion or other, is compute the "flat space > extrapolation" of what we actually see. Of course the > microtubule system cannot present this extrapolation to the > neuronal system because the neuronal system is not big > enough to display it. But it remains "pent-up" or "latent" > somewhere in the cytoskeleton, and through some process of > subconscious mentation, dreaming etc., it gets composed and > edited into what we are now calling "an afterlife dream > world". > Okay, that is how and why it gets composed. Now we have > to address, how and why it downloads at death. Presumably, > death occurs from the top down. That is, the neuronal > system shuts down or "flat lines" first. And then begins > the slower process of the disintegration of the > cytoskeleton-microtubule system. My first intuition would > be that the flat lining of the neuronal system is what > triggers the afterlife download in the cytoskeleton. Perhaps > for instance, the neuronal-cytoskeletal system is originally > a "closed loop" feedback system and when the neuronal system > flatlines at death the cytoskeleton system goes "open-loop" > and this simply causes the cytoskeleton system to "dump" any > heretofore undisplayed information into the entire > cytoskeleton whereas previously it was negative feedback > from the neuronal system that was truncating that > information and keeping it in check, i.e. keeping it pent-up > in the microtubule memory. That s one of certainly many > possibilities. > And I must add here, that this death dream signal may > not only flood just the cytoskeleton of the brain, it could > just as easily flood the cytoskeleton of the entire body > since the entire cytoskeleton of the brain is interconnected > by microwave gap junctions . This means that your entire > body and your entire brain, your entire sensory apparatus, > motor apparatus, and cognitive system would be experiencing > this dream firsthand. It would in other words, be > completely real! This is why the microtubule computer in > the brain is sufficient to do the job of Tipler s > "astronomical sized"computer". His computer was designed to > synthesize a human being from scratch, while nature has the > advantage of having the actual physical body in the form of > the cytoskeleton actually present in the microtubule > computer! This reduces the size of the necessary computer > by a "double exponential" sized factor! And this literally > brings the problem down to earth. > > Serious intellectual commentary is invited, hecklers will be > killfiled. > ======================================== > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > ======================================= This is an interesting theory. I wonder how one would go about testing it empirically.
From: Tunel Vision on 9 Dec 2009 17:17 On Dec 10, 1:30 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > LOG 12-9-09 THE DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > > Copyright December 2009, George Hammond you copyright the December month !?? > > In a previous USENET post (above) I detailed how a short > millisecond signal in the microtubule system of the brain at > Froehlich s frequency could easily contain a year of human > experience, you misunderstand time, you cannot contain a year of time! > and thus even though the bedside observer would > see the person expire in a fraction of a second, the dearly > departed would subjectively live on for a year in > cyber-paradise despite his Frohlich-speed millisecond > demise. wrong again, he never die, with proof > I ve been thinking some more about the death stream > download after talking to Stuart Hameroff by e-mail. > Supposedly the death dream would be pre-recorded in a > running-edit mode during your entire life, every hour, every > second of every day. It would constantly be edited and > distilled, sort of the same process that they use to cut and > edit a Hollywood movie. This in fact, might even be the > primary function of nocturnal dreaming. way too simplistic, you dont understand > So this edited life after death scenario, or dream, is > residing in the microtubule system of the brain ready to > download in a few milliseconds at a moments notice should > death occur. The question then arises as to why this dream has nothing to do with pre-formated dreams nor downloads > would automatically download when you die. My answer to > that is that it must be completely natural, that is a > default mechanism of the death process itself. Supposedly, you are totally misconcepted > the death dream is created by a natural mechanism having to > do with the growth deficit of the brain, and then when you > die, this pent-up font of "flat space" reality, by the same > token, just automatically bursts forth and floods the entire > cytoskeleton of the brain. And this is what produces "life > after death" so-called. no, wrong again, no need for whatever you say your rest of misconceptions i delete, mercifully
From: Olrik on 9 Dec 2009 17:20 Le 2009-12-09 20:13, George Hammond a �crit : > LOG 12-9-09 THE DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > > Copyright December 2009, George Hammond <snip for decency> > Serious intellectual commentary is invited You're insane. Seriously. Thank you for your cooperation. > , hecklers will be killfiled. > ======================================== > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary site > http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > =======================================
From: John Stafford on 9 Dec 2009 17:20
In article <e0bd139f-1d04-41fa-8cc5-6e13834b7625(a)13g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, darwinist <darwinist(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 10, 11:30�am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > > LOG � 12-9-09 � THE DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > > > > Copyright December 2009, George Hammond > > > This is an interesting theory. I wonder how one would go about testing > it empirically. First one has to know whether Frohlich Condensates even exist. They have not yet been observed. Next, we would have to know whether they can possibly exist in our relatively cool body. Next, we have to know whether a quantum state can last a millisecond _anywhere_, and especially a microtubule. That's a long damned time. We must also reconcile this 'secular trend growth deficit' against research that shows that it is _increasing_ rapidly in Western cultures, although it has varied over the history of humankind. Then perhaps Mr. Hammond will explain (hopefully with an illustration) what he means by 'curved/truncated subjective time/space'. That's just get _started_. So far, he has presented no science. |