Impossible Variable Star Curves Predicted by BaTh.
in [Relativity]
|
From: Jerry on 15 Jul 2010 09:28 On Jul 15, 3:42 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Jerry wrote: > > On Jul 14, 1:28 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> the reason that there are far more eclipse type brightness curves than > >> regular flares should be obvious. There are many genuinely eclipsing > >> binaries! > > > Yeah... like approximately 100% of them... > > > Jerry > > I like how Henry can't even name one star he believes supports his opinion. > > I wonder why Henry even talks to me. I've been harassing him for years about > his forged degrees and he just refuses to acknowledge it. It is obviously a > sore spot for him. As you might know, I do not get any delight in using harsh language with Henri. The occasional laughter, the mockery, are all just tools that might eventually force him to confront reality. Mostly I use logic at a level that he can comprehend, even if he refuses to accept. In the last half-dozen years or so since I began corresponding with him, he's been forced to change his position significantly. His position is no longer "Cepheid are orbiting binaries" but rather "Most Cepheids are pulsators, but the light curves are BaTh effects". Likewise, he no longer states, "eclipsing binary curves are strictly BaTh effects" but rather, "although most eclipsing binaries are in fact eclipsing systems, a fraction of them are non-eclipsing systems in which the periodic dips in luminosity are due to BaTh effects". Eventually he may come to realize that BaTh is not needed to explain anything. He "knows" that he can't be wrong, but he sees the world slipping under his feet. His powers of denial are still formidable, however. Jerry
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 15 Jul 2010 15:09 On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Jul 15, 3:42�am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Jerry wrote: >> > On Jul 14, 1:28 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> >> the reason that there are far more eclipse type brightness curves than >> >> regular flares should be obvious. There are many genuinely eclipsing >> >> binaries! >> >> > Yeah... like approximately 100% of them... >> >> > Jerry >> >> I like how Henry can't even name one star he believes supports his opinion. >> >> I wonder why Henry even talks to me. I've been harassing him for years about >> his forged degrees and he just refuses to acknowledge it. It is obviously a >> sore spot for him. > >As you might know, I do not get any delight in using harsh >language with Henri. The occasional laughter, the mockery, are >all just tools that might eventually force him to confront reality. >Mostly I use logic at a level that he can comprehend, even if he >refuses to accept. > >In the last half-dozen years or so since I began corresponding >with him, he's been forced to change his position significantly. >His position is no longer "Cepheid are orbiting binaries" but >rather "Most Cepheids are pulsators, but the light curves are >BaTh effects". Likewise, he no longer states, "eclipsing binary >curves are strictly BaTh effects" but rather, "although most >eclipsing binaries are in fact eclipsing systems, a fraction of >them are non-eclipsing systems in which the periodic dips in >luminosity are due to BaTh effects". > >Eventually he may come to realize that BaTh is not needed to >explain anything. He "knows" that he can't be wrong, but he sees >the world slipping under his feet. > >His powers of denial are still formidable, however. ...........Pathetic.... >Jerry Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 15 Jul 2010 22:49 Jerry wrote: [...] > Eventually he may come to realize that BaTh is not needed to > explain anything. He "knows" that he can't be wrong, but he sees > the world slipping under his feet. I've always been merely satisfied with his simple inability to calculate anything. Q: 'What's the functional form of your acceleration doppler, Henri? A: 'shut up eric' Q: 'Could you show us the derivation of Mercury's perihelion advance using whatever explanation you are using this week?' A: 'Do it for me' Lather, rinse, repeat. > > His powers of denial are still formidable, however. > > Jerry
From: eric gisse on 15 Jul 2010 22:50 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] > ..........Pathetic.... The great Henry Wilson, reduced to one line sniping because he can't deal with what's being said. What a formidable figure in his own mind. [...]
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 16 Jul 2010 18:27
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:49:10 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Jerry wrote: >[...] > >> Eventually he may come to realize that BaTh is not needed to >> explain anything. He "knows" that he can't be wrong, but he sees >> the world slipping under his feet. > >I've always been merely satisfied with his simple inability to calculate >anything. > >Q: 'What's the functional form of your acceleration doppler, Henri? >A: 'shut up eric' > >Q: 'Could you show us the derivation of Mercury's perihelion advance using >whatever explanation you are using this week?' >A: 'Do it for me' > >Lather, rinse, repeat. Gawd! At least poor old Jerry has an excuse for his dementia....but not you.... >> >> His powers of denial are still formidable, however. >> >> Jerry Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. |