From: Mike Williams on
"mayayana" <mayaXXyana(a)rcXXn.com> wrote in message
news:%23s68fYHnKHA.5312(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> I suppose that if the Tibetans had welcomed the
> British then the Chinese wouldn't have invaded, there
> would have been no genocide, and Tibetans could
> live happily ever after serving tea to tourists, working
> as Dell helpdesk technicians, and killing the boredom
> by playing GTA4. :)

.. . . or by reading a gripping novel.

Mike


From: MM on
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:38:16 -0000, "Mike Williams"
<Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote:

>I don't feel any disdain for the various people who have not in the past
>welcomed the British Empire. In fact I don't hold with countries building
>their little empires at the expense of the rest of the world. I think it was
>wrong of us to build our so called British Empire in the first place and I'm
>happy that we have already given most of it back (or in many cases had it
>taken away)

But many of us have still not accepted the demise of Empire, not least
the British Establishment. It's why we are in the Middle East. We
still believe the world stops to listen when the British say
something, whereas in reality it largely couldn't care less.

MM
From: Mike Williams on
"MM" <kylix_is(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:g25ol593i5k7gi2opj882s7i0qjua3h83i(a)4ax.com...

> But many of us have still not accepted the demise of
> Empire, not least the British Establishment. It's why we
> are in the Middle East. We still believe the world stops
> to listen when the British say something, whereas in
> reality it largely couldn't care less.

We are in the Middle East because America is in the Middle east, and America
is in the Middle East because there's oil in the Middle East and because the
Middle east it is poorly defended. It's all about greed.

Mike


From: mayayana on
Woops. The mysterious newsgroup filter is
dropping posts again. I had to use the
double-spacing method to get through.
------------------------

> I n f a c t I w a s a t u a l l y c o m m e n t i n g o n
y o u r s u g g e s t i o n t h a t t h e D a l a i L a m a
f e e l s h e h a s h a s n o n e e d f o r a b r e a k
f r o m t h e r i g o u r s o f d a i l y l i f e a n d I
w a s p o i n t i n g o u t t h a t h e c e r t a i n l y
s h o u l d n o t h a v e s u c h a n e e d s i n c e i t
w a s h e w h o r a n a w a y f r o m t h e C h i n e s e
i n t o a p e r s o n a l l i f e o f s a f e t y a n d l u x
u r y ,
l e a v i n g h i s p o o r a n d i m p o v e r i s h e d p e o p
l e
t o t h e i r f a t e .
>

T h a t ' s a n u n u s u a l t a k e o n t h e D a l a i
L a m a t h a t I ' v e n e v e r h e a r d b e f o r e , b u t
p r o b a b l y n o t t o o f a r f r o m w h a t t h e
C h i n e s e g o v t . w o u l d l i k e p e o p l e t o
b e l i e v e . ( H e e s c a p e d a t a b o u t t h e
a g e o f 2 0 f r o m t h e p r o b a b l e f a t e o f
b e i n g a p u p p e t k i n g u n d e r h o u s e a r r e s t
..
I d o n ' t k n o w e n o u g h a b o u t t h e f a c t s
t o h o l d m u c h o f a v i e w a b o u t w h e t h e r
t h a t w a s t h e b e s t c o u r s e o f a c t i o n .
A n d I d o n ' t k n o w f o r s u r e w h e t h e r h e
w o r k s a l l d a y i n t h e s e r v i c e o f h i s
p e o p l e o r w h e t h e r h e r e a l l y j u s t
l o u n g e s b y t h e p o o l , l i s t e n i n g t o
J i m m y B u f f e t . : )

I n a n y c a s e , m y o r i g i n a l c o m m e n t
w a s n ' t a b o u t t h e D a l a i L a m a ' s p o l i t i c s .
I w a s a d d r e s s i n g t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f
" f u n " . T h e D a l a i L a m a ' s r e m a r k w a s
s h e d d i n g l i g h t o n t h e n a t u r e o f
e n t e r t a i n m e n t .... t h a t i t ' s a t l e a s t
w o r t h w h i l e t o r e f l e c t o n w h y w e s o
o f t e n f e e l a n e e d t o r e j e c t o u r a c t u a l
e x p e r i e n c e i n f a v o r o f e n t e r t a i n m e n t .
I n o t h e r w o r d s , h e w a s s a y i n g ,
" W h a t d o e s o n e t a k e a b r e a k f r o m ?
R e a l i t y ? O n e ' s o w n e x p e r i e n c e ? "
I n t h e f i n a l a n a l y s i s , w h a t w e t a k e
a b r e a k f r o m i s o u r o w n e x p e r i e n c e ,
n o w . Which is a l l t h e r e i s . S u c h a
" b r e a k " i s r e a l l y t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f
p s y c h o s i s . Y e t w e r e f e r t o i t a s " f u n "
w i t h o u t e v e r g i v i n g t h a t v e r y m u c h
t h o u g h t . ( T h u s , f o o d f o r t h o u g h t . )

I ' m u s i n g " e n t e r t a i n m e n t " h e r e i n
a b r o a d s e n s e - - s o m e t h i n g l i k e a
b a b y ' s p a c i f i e r . W h a t e v e r s e l f -
c o n f i r m i n g t h i n g w e " t r e a t " o u r s e l v e s
w i t h w h e n w e f e e l t h a t w e d e s e r v e
a t r e a t / v a c a t i o n : G T A 4 , a n o v e l , a
w a l k o n t h e b e a c h . . . I t c o u l d b e a s
b i g a s p u r s u i n g a C E O - s h i p o r a s
s m a l l a s e a t i n g a c o o k i e .



From: Mike Williams on
"mayayana" <mayaXXyana(a)rcXXn.com> wrote in message
news:ObMPUBRnKHA.5508(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> I w a s a d d r e s s i n g t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f
> " f u n " . T h e D a l a i L a m a ' s r e m a r k w a s
> s h e d d i n g l i g h t o n t h e n a t u r e o f
> e n t e r t a i n m e n t .... t h a t i t ' s a t l e a s t
> w o r t h w h i l e t o r e f l e c t o n w h y w e s o
> o f t e n f e e l a n e e d t o r e j e c t o u r a c t u a l
> e x p e r i e n c e i n f a v o r o f e n t e r t a i n m e n t .

You mean like MM does when he reads his "gripping novels". If you think
things like that are not desirable then why don't
you address your comments to MM?

> I n o t h e r w o r d s , h e w a s s a y i n g ,
> " W h a t d o e s o n e t a k e a b r e a k f r o m ?
> R e a l i t y ? O n e ' s o w n e x p e r i e n c e ? "
> I n t h e f i n a l a n a l y s i s , w h a t w e t a k e
> a b r e a k f r o m i s o u r o w n e x p e r i e n c e ,
> n o w . Which is a l l t h e r e i s . S u c h a
> " b r e a k " i s r e a l l y t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f
> p s y c h o s i s . Y e t w e r e f e r t o i t a s " f u n "

I don't think the Dalai Lama interpreted it as psychosis on his part when he
took a break from the realities of living in Tibet and when he ran away and
left his poor impoverished people, of whom he was supposed to be the
spiritual leader and head of state, to their fate at the hands of the
thoroughly nasty Chinese. He simply ran away to take a break in another
country, where he lived and where he continues to live a life of luxury for
more than fifty years whilst the poor impoverished Tibetan people he
abandoned and of whom he still continues to regard himself as the spiritual
leader suffer the fate imposed on them by their new and nasty Chinese
masters :-) The Dalai Lama certainly seemed to think that he needed a break
then!

Mike