Relativistic Doppler shift
in [Relativity]
|
From: Koobee Wublee on 28 Jul 2010 13:03 On Jul 28, 6:18 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Jul 27, 11:20 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > > Dono, the one who does not know anything, needs to be advised that > > according the equation describing energy, the transverse Doppler > > effect under SR is exactly the opposite of what you wrote. See below. > > > E' = E / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2) > > > h f' = h f / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2) > > > f_observed = f_emitted / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2) > > > Once again, SR (as well as GR) is able to predict anything possible > > (ie: anything you can imagine). Some would say the ability for SR and > > GR to predict any phenomena possible, even if they are contradictory > > to each, is the greatest achievements of relativity. However, true > > scholars of physicists would know better. They would call that > > completely bullshit. <shrug> > > I am Dono, and I am a nincompoop. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_Doppler_effect#Transverse_Doppler_effect From the Lorentz transform, one sees that the time transformation is given by the following. dt = (dt [B] * d[s] / c) / sqrt(1 B^2) Where ** [B] c = Velocity of dt as observed by dt, a vector ** [s] = Displacement vector of the observed as observed by dt ** * = Dot product of two vectors Claiming the frequency is just the inverse of time, the above equation becomes the following. f = f sqrt(1 B^2) / (1 [B] * (d[s]/dt) / c) Or f = f sqrt(1 B^2) / (1 [B] * [c] / c) Where ** f = 1 / dt ** f = 1 / dt ** d[s]/dt = [c] All the transformations (non-ballistic theory of light) that satisfy the null results of the MMX (including the Voigt, Larmors, and the Lorentz transforms) arrive at the following equation describing the transformation of energy. E = (E [B] * [p] c) / sqrt(1 B^2) Where ** [p] = Observed momentum by E, a vector Throw in Plancks work plagiarized by Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, the above equation becomes the following. f = f (1 [B] * [c] / c) / sqrt(1 B^2) Where ** [p] c = h f [c] / c ** E = h f ** E = h f Anyone not a nincompoop would immediately notice a direct contradiction of the conclusion. <shrug> The claim of the frequency being the inverse of time is actually wrong. Consider the time transformation under the Galilean transform below. dt = dt Embracing the above claim, the above equation becomes the following which indicates no Doppler effect. Thus, this claim is just wrong. I notice quite a few applications are done this way in quantum mechanics. f = f <shrug>
From: Dono. on 28 Jul 2010 13:17 On Jul 28, 10:03 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > snip imbecilities< You are a cretin, Woobler
From: eric gisse on 28 Jul 2010 16:14 Dono. wrote: > On Jul 28, 10:03 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> snip imbecilities< > > You are a cretin, Woobler Wow, he's still around? I killfiled him long ago. Nobody even responds to him anymore, he's like poncho.
From: whoever on 29 Jul 2010 01:55 "Koobee Wublee" wrote in message news:db4d65cc-0782-4b3c-8b0a-d805654bac7f(a)w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > >On Jul 28, 10:03 am, Koobee Wublee wrote: > >> > From the Lorentz transform, one sees that the time transformation is >> > given by the following. >> >> > dt� = (dt � [B] * d[s] / c) / sqrt(1 � B^2) >> >> > Where >> >> > ** [B] c = Velocity of dt� as observed by dt, a vector That makes no sense .. how can an interval of time have a velocity or observe anything > > ** [s] = Displacement vector of the observed as observed by dt > > ** * = Dot product of two vectors --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: BURT on 29 Jul 2010 18:35
On Jul 27, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > The turn of the Earth drives up light's energy at point of absorption > by an always blue gamma shift. > > Mitch Raemsch Linear motion of matter towards or away from light changes its absorption energy by blue and red shifts caused by matter's motion. When side ways there is no change in energy. Everywhere inbetween there are angles of partical energy shift by gamma. What energy is doing effects the energy of light at absorption. So does angle of absorption. Mitch Raemsch |